Quote (IceMage @ Jun 13 2020 10:20am)
It seems that you're in constant excuse mode. You don't seem to be affirming what the president has done as good and wise, but rather dismissing or minimizing his moves.
Let me ask this, what has Trump done in regards to North Korea that you think is praiseworthy? What risks did he take that paid off? What moves has he made since the last meeting that could pay off? You're probably more informed on this stuff than I am, so I'm curious.
They're not excuses, they're explanations. I don't agree with much of what the president says and does, but I try not to make the mistake our media and certain commentators make in assuming that night is day in order to contradict Trump. Everything he does is not wrong, and we shouldn't discourage his good tendencies just because we dislike his bad ones.
Trump reached out to North Korea and initiated dialogue, that is good. The DPRK is throwing a tantrum now because the last meeting didn't go as well as they hoped, and they don't like being ignored. That's also good in a way, because it demonstrates their desire to establish a productive relationship. Much like Trump, North Korea doesn't know how to "act" in our sense of the word. Rather than dismissing them, we should try to understand their underlying motives, because they are acting rationally as it makes sense to them.
A poor, isolated North Korea is one that's necessarily dependent on China. Kim Jung Un has specifically moved to distance himself from China (e.g. executing his uncle, a confidant of the CCP regime), but it's difficult to take that too far when he's dependent on Chinese assistance and lacks an alternative.
We don't have the means to overthrow the regime without tremendous cost, so we have to decide, do we ignore the regime or engage with them? The more North Korea is pushed to liberalize its economic system (which is already taking place given that the command economy collapsed decades ago), the better off their people will be, the more influence we will have over the country, and the better positioned to exploit the inevitable collapse of the Kim regime. Our goal should be for this to develop along Vietnam lines, and not have the new leadership (generals?) rushing into Chinese arms.