Quote (Thor123422 @ 7 Oct 2019 07:59)
I suppose you can substantiate an economic expert or politician saying that printing the budget won't cause other problems? Because that seems pretty outlandish. Somebody proposing MMT as a policy isn't necessarily ignoring the potential problems.
https://www.businessinsider.de/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-ommt-modern-monetary-theory-how-pay-for-policies-2019-1?r=US&IR=TQuote
[AOC] said she was open to Modern Monetary Theory, a burgeoning theory among some economists positing that the federal debt is not an economic restraint for the US. She said the idea, which holds that the government doesn't need to balance the budget and that budget surpluses actually hurt the economy, "absolutely" needed to be "a larger part of our conversation."
There you go, AOC saying that the government should increase deficit spending according to MMT; and the "the government doesnt need to balance the budget"-part implies that it wont cause (noteworthy) problems.
Quote (Ghot @ 7 Oct 2019 06:09)
Naw... MMT stands for Magic Money Tree. :)
LOL, good one!
Quote (ofthevoid @ 7 Oct 2019 06:28)
If only these tards understood how that destroys people’s savings. Blue collar people saving all their life only to get wiped out by currency devaluation due to increased money printing.
The people that want to print money endlessly are the same that cry about why real asset prices are skyrocketing. No shit a house is going to double in price when your answer to economic woes is to just print more money.
Why is it that the most bold proposals for reorganizing our economy always come from the most economically illiterate people?
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 7 2019 05:54am