Quote (IceMage @ Jun 23 2018 06:40am)
But I thought all the coverage of North Korea(outside of Trump propaganda networks) was negative?
You've been teetering on the edge of Trump conspiracy theory land for a while... you might as well jump in with both feet. It'll be necessary to be on that side when more Mueller indictments start flying. :)
The media can control whats being covered and how they spin it, but that doesn't necessarily mean they can control how the public will react to it.
The fact is, Trump was polling better on his north korea policy than any other issue in his entire presidency;
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/most-americans-approve-of-how-trump-handled-north-korea-according-to-new-pollQuote
new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research released Thursday finds that 55 percent of Americans approve of Trump’s diplomacy with North Korea, up from 42 percent in March and 34 percent last October. It’s the highest rating for the Republican president on any individual issue on an AP-NORC poll since his inauguration.
If they wanted to run away from covering any news issue that could help trump, that would be the #1, and the OIG report wasn't exactly doing the anti-trump narrative any favors.
Really though, how did the sudden coverage of the border spring into being? Where did it start?
there are totally unnoticed articles for the past few weeks mentioning it and nobody paying any attention to them
then suddenly this:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=separation&geo=UShttps://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=family%20separation