Hello,
I created four elaborated theories in social sciences:

• a particular theory of culturalism
  https://image.ibb.co/mz1WHo/map.jpg
  
• the theory of adequacy / inadequacy
  https://image.ibb.co/jc7Jty/social_intelligence.jpg
  
• the theory of the 7 characteristics of the warrior
  https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=78676210&f=266
  
• the theory of the creative slender, and the imaginative chubby

I would like those working in politics to be interested in my theories.
But politicians never take the time to take an interest in social intelligence.

What do you think of my theories?
I think that could change the way the UN works.



This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jun 7 2018 02:01pm

you're posting these theories in a web forum user blog....

go get accredited in social science, they aren't and rightfully shouldnt look in places like d2jsp to find your stuff.

Just saw that he posts like twenty posts a day back to back in his blog about this shit.

He's definitely not a pharmacist if he has that kind of free time.......

Where's the option: Queen Elizabeth II runs the UN lowkey and must apologise

Hey Chev

Can you define social intelligence for me? I'm confused on what exactly you mean by that.

Look at my profile (last line).
social intelligence is the intelligence (understandings, knowledge, quick interpretations...) that concerns social sciences





I am a pharmacist, and that's why I care about the World.





Sociology is a basic science.
Politics is the applied science that is associated.
There should be a connection between these two sciences, but there is none.

Why?
Because there is too little naivety in society.
By virtue of the 6-pointed star, naivety is a quality.
https://image.ibb.co/dD87oS/etoile.png

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jun 7 2018 04:05pm

Too little naivety?

I think you mean too much?

Better repeat the same shit 10 time to make sure
Nobody care about your sect

TIL Politicians don't care about social sciences.