d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > How To Solve The Game Of Chess? > The Old Bible Strategy
Prev123459Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 16 2018 12:48pm
The game of chess is all about philosophy.
All scientists make the same pathetic mistake.
Member
Posts: 90,565
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
May 16 2018 12:57pm
So how will you "solve chess"?

Make a strategy no one can beat?
Member
Posts: 8,075
Joined: Dec 28 2016
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 40%
May 16 2018 01:25pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 16 2018 08:07am)
you forgot the > to make you seem whacky and original.



>keeps asking
>doesnt get that asking is upsetting me

There you go pal
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
May 16 2018 05:31pm
Quote (Chevaucheur @ May 16 2018 12:48pm)
The game of chess is all about philosophy.
All scientists make the same pathetic mistake.


Dude, your communication skills are utter garbage.

It doesn't matter what your theories are if you can't communicate them effectively.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 16 2018 05:32pm
Member
Posts: 8,075
Joined: Dec 28 2016
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 40%
May 16 2018 05:47pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 16 2018 03:31pm)
Dude, your communication skills are utter garbage.

It doesn't matter what your theories are if you can't communicate them effectively.



Saw the theories
Member
Posts: 12,174
Joined: Mar 4 2006
Gold: 4,900.00
May 16 2018 08:18pm
This guy again with his revolutionary theories LOL.....

What makes you believe people study chess with a linear approach? Having fixed constraints makes nothing about an approach incorrect or linear, just realistic.
Member
Posts: 90,565
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
May 17 2018 09:28am
Quote (Xx Shin3d0wn xX @ May 16 2018 08:18pm)
This guy again with his revolutionary theories LOL.....

What makes you believe people study chess with a linear approach? Having fixed constraints makes nothing about an approach incorrect or linear, just realistic.


this. essentially OP is including moves you can't make on a chessboard to attempt solving what moves can be made on a chessboard. assuming that's what he's trying to "solve", i've asked a few times what solutions he's looking for and have gotten no answer. Checkmate sequences, escape from checks, etc could all be included in that. i'm not sure what he's attempting to prove, but all he's done in any case is create a new game that has not bearing on the original game.

all in some weird attempt to get notice on his social science rants which are just wordsalad, at least in english.
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 17 2018 02:04pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 17 2018 05:28pm)
i've asked a few times what solutions he's looking for and have gotten no answer.


I don't understand your question.
I am looking for THE solution.
There is one only solution to the game of chess.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 17 2018 02:04pm
Member
Posts: 9,614
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 268.15
May 17 2018 02:08pm
If it misses a march to a staircase, you can still use it.
For chess, it's the same thing.

It's not because there are edges in the game that you have to do an analysis of a game with edges.
It is not because it misses a walk that one can not use a staircase.

You do not have the right philosophy.

Sephardim are much smarter than Ashkenazim, you should listen to me.
;)

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 17 2018 02:09pm
Member
Posts: 90,565
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
May 17 2018 02:15pm
Quote (Chevaucheur @ May 17 2018 02:04pm)
I don't understand your question.
I am looking for THE solution.
There is one only solution to the game of chess.


ok so you're trying to solve for the best strategy to get checkmate from the start of a game?

or you're trying to solve for checkmate from common positions of pieces in the end game?

either way the only answer for those questions, in a game of chess that has a border, is analysis of how the pieces act inside that border. otherwise you're just solving how to get checkmate on a limitless board, which has no bearing on a limited board.

this would be like studying strategies for the 100 meter dash to make conclusions about marathon running, it's nonsensical. adding what moves pieces COULD make on a limitless board saying nothing about how they can produce a checkmate.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev123459Next
Closed New Topic New Poll