Quote (AspenSniper @ Apr 1 2018 11:20am)
I don’t understand how this is even debated. Once your child turns 18 and is old enough to fight back, it’s assault. In Canada you can’t hit children younger than 2 or older than 12. Other than that, it’s assault.
Regardless of the argument that spanking or hitting teaches your child, it’s overwhelmingly proven that it often goes too far physically, and causes major long term emotional and mental damage to the child in many cases. There are always many people who believe that if they weren’t hit as a child, they’d have grown up as a brat or entitled, etc. I simply don’t understand why you can’t sprak to your child, teach them, ground them, find more accurate means of punishment that suit the need to teach and raise a child.
Discuss why people think it’s okay to hit an entirely innocent child while it is illegal to hit them once they’re old enough to hit you back and cause damage.
So don't go too far.
If they were "entirely innocent," I don't think we'd be having this discussion.