Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 5 2018 10:00am)
yeah these guys agree: :rolleyes:
Apple has put whole companies out of business by stealing from them and claiming it was their work.
Keep in mind i'm not strictly against this practice generally, but to say "computers thrived" doesnt seem correct, as many of the companies that started up were sabotaged or competed out of business.
Companies aren't computer technology. Computer technology thrived and we didn't' stop seeing advancements just because their technology could be implemented by others.
Just listing the number of failed, acquired, or changed businesses isn't really meaningful in this discussion.
Also a good portion of these are recent, not during the hayday of computer development that was silicon valley in the 70's, 80's and 90's.
Quote (Chainsaw47 @ Apr 5 2018 10:10am)
I agree with the second part, but it doesn't apply to all industries. I work in metallurgy and some industrial processes do require huge investments and years to copy, but for pharmaceutical companies, the work and time is in the design, not the manufacturing.
As for the first part, Microsoft and Apple probably put more companies out of business than most other companies combined in thr world, mostly by using patent protection.
The second part favors my position, in that they couldn't do that if we stopped having patent protection.
If anybody can implement it then your idea probably isn't worth protecting.
Either way, you have the first-brand advantage. If you get doctors to start prescribing your medication first it's a clear advantage and you will have to put effort into getting them to change to the second brand. So you still have an advantage.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on Apr 5 2018 04:31pm