d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Democracy Dies In Darkness > Wapo > Project Veritas
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Nov 27 2017 09:03pm
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 27 2017 08:56pm)
Like I said...the whole story is unverifiable.

The gofundme page that was also proof...was also deleted. The whole WP story is completely unverifiable.

/e On top of everything else...it was also the WP that interviewed the 1st girl to complain about Moore, the 14 year old.
I beleive I qouted part of that article too, something about the WP "encouraging" the lady to "tell all". Encouraging her, repeatedly.


Ghot with no evidence and desparately trying to change the subject away from his God Emperor's failings.
Member
Posts: 104,138
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Nov 27 2017 09:13pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 27 2017 10:03pm)
Ghot with no evidence and desparately trying to change the subject away from his God Emperor's failings.




Nope I cited two points of evidence, that this story by the WP might be fakenews as this story isn't verifiable.
I mean without even trying I find that they told one lie right out, and then any proof for the whole article they posted was deleted (conveniently) from Twitter and the goFundme page as well.


I mean, the story sounds too convenient for the WP to me.
Member
Posts: 65,877
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 27 2017 09:21pm
Quote (Ghot @ 28 Nov 2017 04:13)
I mean, the story sounds too convenient for the WP to me.


nono, what is convenient for you now is to proceed a complete denial :lol:
Member
Posts: 53,433
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,525.35
Nov 27 2017 09:26pm
Not all stings and undercover journalism expose everything they were checking for.
why is that some terrible thing in your view?
they managed to figure out she worked for this org and didnt run the story.

Quote (duffman316 @ Nov 27 2017 09:32pm)
holy shit, the fucking idiot is publishing this as a victory :wacko:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf_Wcnyaak8


wapo admitting they have a heavy leftist bias is a win and its something alot of people dont realize.
Member
Posts: 53,137
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Nov 27 2017 10:06pm
Quote (IceMage @ 27 Nov 2017 22:14)
They didn't ignore a troll...

shocker

Quote (IceMage @ 27 Nov 2017 22:14)
they vetted a potential source

someone shopping a story. do the supermarket rags boast when they catch someone fishing? not to this level, and half of them still run bigfoot sightings



Quote (IceMage @ 27 Nov 2017 22:14)
It’s irrelevant whether you vote in Alabama or not.

yep voting protocols are irrelevant to the lefties

Quote (IceMage @ 27 Nov 2017 22:14)
The Trump cult thinks the Moore accusers are lying either for political reasons or financial reasons, and that WaPo was happy to report their lies without proper vetting. That's how you guys

cult cult cult crutch

again who is “you guys”
some privileged liberal lefty using such inflammatory language is unbecoming

maybe stay off the Trump reddit because stalking people you disagree with and then wagging a crooked finger at some other group isnt a surefire path to persuading others to your cause

again, you made a thread comparing wapo (funded by the richest man in the world as of this post) to project veritas as peers. who really ‘wins’ this “battle”?

This post was edited by excellence on Nov 27 2017 10:08pm
Member
Posts: 45,817
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,186.49
Nov 27 2017 10:25pm
O'Queefe strikes out

also, this story offends me as a troll. How fucking incompetent is O'Keefe? He is so far gone he could not possibly pass the ideological turing test. Its like when hate crime hoaxers leave behind notes that read "Powerful and brave women of color like yourself need to shut up or we'll kill you!". He tried to sell them on a story that Roy Moore impregnated an underage girl and made her have an abortion. That would have immediately made them suspicious as 'too good to be true'. He could have toned it down, created some plausible and coherent storyline, mixed in some half truths, done the legwork to set up references, but nope, he actually believed WaPo could be duped that easily because he believes his own propaganda.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Nov 27 2017 10:29pm
Member
Posts: 77,514
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Nov 27 2017 11:47pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Nov 27 2017 10:26pm)
Not all stings and undercover journalism expose everything they were checking for.
why is that some terrible thing in your view?
they managed to figure out she worked for this org and didnt run the story.



wapo admitting they have a heavy leftist bias is a win and its something alot of people dont realize.


that's what you got out of this?
the real story here is an attempt by an organization with a long history of lies and deception to discredit the stories of the women who've accused roy moore by trying to serve wapo with a false news story
i've said it before, the world would legit be an ever so slightly better place to live if someone put a bullet in james o'keefe's head after the filthy shit he pulled with acorn

This post was edited by duffman316 on Nov 27 2017 11:47pm
Member
Posts: 53,433
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,525.35
Nov 28 2017 12:02am
Quote
that's what you got out of this?

thats one part of it yes.


Quote (duffman316 @ Nov 28 2017 12:47am)
that's what you got out of this?
the real story here is an attempt by an organization with a long history of lies and deception to discredit the stories of the women who've accused roy moore by trying to serve wapo with a false news story
i've said it before, the world would legit be an ever so slightly better place to live if someone put a bullet in james o'keefe's head after the filthy shit he pulled with acorn


Are you opposed to sting operations and undercover journalism on principle?
do you believe it is immoral to test the journalistic integrity of a major news org?
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Nov 28 2017 12:12am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Nov 28 2017 12:02am)
thats one part of it yes.




Are you opposed to sting operations and undercover journalism on principle?
do you believe it is immoral to test the journalistic integrity of a major news org?


Are you familiar with O'Keefe's previous work?
Member
Posts: 77,514
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Nov 28 2017 12:17am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Nov 28 2017 01:02am)
thats one part of it yes.




Are you opposed to sting operations and undercover journalism on principle?
do you believe it is immoral to test the journalistic integrity of a major news org?


there's something ironic about demonstrating a lack of integrity while simultaneously questioning someone else on the morality of using lies and deception to test the integrity of a news organization
are you capable of acknowledging the clear motives here?

if i seduced your wife and she resisted my attempts and you found out about it, what would you say to the question of whether or not it's immoral to test the fidelity of a spouse?

This post was edited by duffman316 on Nov 28 2017 12:22am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll