d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Poor People Don't Need Internet > Maga
12310Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 77,539
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Nov 21 2017 11:51am
looks like the free market oriented fcc is hacking away at support for internet services in rural/poor areas

one the one side of this issue we have people who believe that everyone should have access to the internet
on the other side of the issue we have people who believe they shouldn't have to subsidize the internet services of people who can't afford it - oh yea and they probably love comcast

where do our resident pardians stand on this issue :o ?

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/17/technology/fcc-lifeline-poor-americans/index.html

Quote
The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday voted to begin scaling back a program designed to help low-income Americans access the internet.
The federal Lifeline program, established in 1985, provides discounted phone and internet service in poorer communities. The FCC expanded the program to include broadband last year, and has given participating households a $9.25 per month credit to use for internet access.
Thursday's 3-2 party line vote means one piece of the program will change immediately, and lays the ground work to alter or kill other pieces.
The commission will almost immediately limit a $25 extra subsidy for homes situated anywhere on Tribal lands to rural areas only. The benefit is applied on top of the $9.25 subsidy already offered by the program.

Another proposal still under consideration by the panel includes preventing resellers, or internet providers that don't run their own infrastructure like AT&T or Sprint, from providing Lifeline support, meaning some in the program might not be able to stay with their current provider, or sign up with one at all.
The FCC has approved providers for the last two years, but another proposal under consideration would send that approval power to the states. Earlier this year, the FCC blocked nine companies from participating in the program.
Commissioners are also considering a proposal to cap the total amount spent on the program. Democrat commissioner Mignon Clyburn says the suggested cap is $820 million, more than half the current budget of $2.25 billion.
In their decisions, Republican FCC commissioners who voted to consider the proposals and implement the new rules cited a May 2017 Government Accountability Report that found waste, fraud, and abuse in the program.
Critics say new and proposed restrictions could harm poor consumers.
In a statement, commissioner Clyburn said eliminating resellers would mean a lot of people would have to find new internet providers, and may not have options other than the one they use.
"Over 70% of wireless Lifeline consumers will be told they cannot use their preferred carrier and preferred plan, and on top of that, they may not have a carrier to turn to after that happens," Clyburn wrote.


This post was edited by duffman316 on Nov 21 2017 11:51am
Member
Posts: 9,943
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 18,534.02
Nov 21 2017 11:52am
Quote (duffman316 @ Nov 21 2017 12:51pm)
looks like the free market oriented fcc is hacking away at support for internet services in rural/poor areas

one the one side of this issue we have people who believe that everyone should have access to the internet
on the other side of the issue we have people who believe they shouldn't have to subsidize the internet services of people who can't afford it - oh yea and they probably love comcast

where do our resident pardians stand on this issue :o ?

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/17/technology/fcc-lifeline-poor-americans/index.html


The internet is a service, not a right.

Member
Posts: 24,504
Joined: Mar 2 2008
Gold: 2,004.41
Nov 21 2017 11:57am
Quote (djman72 @ Nov 21 2017 11:52am)
The internet is a service, not a right.


first post best post
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Nov 21 2017 11:59am
Quote (djman72 @ Nov 21 2017 10:52am)
The internet is a service, not a right.


other thread that guy actually gave some good arguments on why its a right, to be fair

edit: meant right

This post was edited by JohnMiller92 on Nov 21 2017 12:00pm
Banned
Posts: 126
Joined: Nov 20 2017
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 21 2017 12:02pm
Poor people should not even be allowed to be on the internet. They don't fulfill their dreams of becoming something great
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Nov 21 2017 12:03pm
Quote (AntiMulti @ Nov 21 2017 11:02am)
Poor people should not even be allowed to be on the internet. They don't fulfill their dreams of becoming something great


Back to /pol pleaze ty sir have nice day
Banned
Posts: 126
Joined: Nov 20 2017
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 21 2017 12:08pm
Quote (JohnMiller92 @ Nov 21 2017 07:03pm)
Back to /pol pleaze ty sir have nice day


A slave do not command. Back to utopia dreams glhfinhell miss :baby:
Member
Posts: 24,504
Joined: Mar 2 2008
Gold: 2,004.41
Nov 21 2017 12:11pm
Quote (JohnMiller92 @ Nov 21 2017 12:03pm)
Back to /pol pleaze ty sir have nice day


this

open racists have to go. I prefer to keep my racism hidden behind the guise of smaller government, yet strong support for police and free markets over any kind of government welfare
Member
Posts: 66,064
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 21 2017 12:12pm
Quote (AntiMulti @ 21 Nov 2017 19:08)
A slave do not command. Back to utopia dreams glhfinhell miss :baby:


Hey Winternight you used several multis and got banned

http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=462519

How about crouching and stop posting ?
Member
Posts: 9,374
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 3,260.00
Nov 21 2017 01:56pm
How does this affect VPNs? Could my ISP just shutdown traffic I send through a VPN and try to force me to send my data through them un-encrypted?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12310Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll