Quote (djman72 @ Oct 4 2017 02:01pm)
Wrong. That is not his point, which is the entire problem with his argument.
I would agree with both of you that, in this one scenario, that a mother was purposely getting pregnant knowing that with 100% certainty (that's the important part here, folks) that the child will die then it's wrong.
If there is a chance she can bring a child into this world, then it's absolutely fine.
I have no moral outrage here, it's simply common sense.
Quote (IceMage @ Oct 4 2017 02:03pm)
There's a difference between knowing the unborn baby will die, and knowing there's a good chance the unborn baby will die. It's an interesting question, but I don't think it's comparable. Miscarriages are very common, nature made it that way, and intent is the major factor here.
I suppose there's an argument to be made that if a woman knows every pregnancy will miscarriage, she's on the same moral ground as a woman who gets an abortion, but is it even possible to have that knowledge?
What about 99%?
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 4 2017 02:35pm)
You literally don't have an argument. You fail to understand even the most basic of principles that differentiate the two.
Abortion is a free & voluntary choice. Miscarriage is not. Even if the probability of life failing is high does not negate the intent that the person trying to conceive isn't doing so because they are some sick fuck that enjoys miscarriage but they genuinely want a child.
This is no joke, one of the worst arguments against pro-life i have ever heard. I would like to thank you because such bad arguments are low hanging fruit to make your camp look idiotic.
Conception is a choice and conception with the knowledge that the baby will (probably, definitely, take your pick) die is a choice.
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 4 2017 02:04pm)
...except this is never the case. Even with women that have had multiple miscarriages there is a probability that the baby will survive. I challenge you to find me examples were doctors have proven 100% a baby will die due to miscarriage and the women continues on trying to make a baby.
Abortion is a rational choice on the part of the women, miscarriage is not. Why is this such a hard concept to understand?
This is a thought experiment, follow it through to its logical conclusion disregarding practicality.
If you insist on focusing on the probability, what is the exact percentage of baby survival rate at which it becomes morally permissible to conceive?
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 4 2017 05:51pm)
I would adopt after the third. This would never happen to me.
I applaud your mindset.
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 4 2017 08:27pm)
But we are discussing legality, not morality. Completely different things. Pro-choice is concerning the legality of abortion, not morality.
I think the moral discussion is much more interesting than the legal one.
Quote (DCSS @ Oct 4 2017 08:36pm)
The more they try and fail the sadder I feel for them, not for some lives that didn't exist. I don't know why you'd even make it about the embryo's that are being lost when the actual human being that has a mind rights and feelings is probably on an emotional roller coaster of hope and pain while trying to get a pregnancy to stick.
Couldn't agree more.
Quote (DCSS @ Oct 4 2017 08:52pm)
if the government disallows someone from even attempting to pursue a pregnancy, isn't that murder
No, it is not, unless your definition of murder includes possible lives.
This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 4 2017 10:56pm