Quote (TiStuff @ Apr 12 2024 11:48pm)
you would have to find someone thats been there . then if you believed them that would be faith and that would make you a religious kook
you ever consider just how much you believe by faith. you should ponder it, it might just astonish you
You should know well by now that your logical fallacies don't work on me. I know you desperately trying to draw parallels between your religion which do not exist.
First off "you would
have to find someone thats been there"
No I don't, it would be nice but not a requirement
Secondly "then if you believed them that would be faith and that would make you a religious kook"
This assumes that they provided no evidence because that's what faith is belief without evidence.
Even if you believed some random person without cross examination or evidence =/= automatically make you a religious person
false equivalence much?
Thirdly "you ever consider just how much you believe by faith"
Not really I use the word trust. When I trust it's usually for things I don't really care or it wouldn't matter to me.
For things that matter or verification I do due diligence, look for evidence, test it out, research and get a collective feedback from many sources. Relying purely on faith is foolhardy way to live.
Faith is something naive and guillable people rely on. Reason and evidence is something intelligent and wise people use.
This post was edited by addone on Apr 12 2024 02:41pm