Quote (Skinned @ Sep 20 2017 06:40pm)
Aristolean logic.....you can prove that Socrates is immortal with that argument form....the guy using it knows that....what does he gain by doing this?
Im not seeing the connection or the direct rebuttal.
Quote
Shallow, black and white thinking, that doesn't further the conversation in any way.
Namecalling without refutation. Its so shallow and invalidly black and white that you cant come up with any sort of argument against it?
Do you think considering someone bad for enforcing unjust 'cruel and wicked' laws is wrong? why?