Quote (Vincenzo @ Aug 30 2017 11:09am)
No. If sufficient proof has been provided that a user has scammed, said user will have a scammer tag.
Users are innocent until proven guilty and I believe this would promote many false accusations.
I suggest you use a
Mediator for your trades if you feel uncomfortable.
you make a good point, but with that said, many user's are able to get away with said scam for that exact reason (insufficient proof) and will keep on scamming people until tagged...
Many Gm users would prefer to avoid these type of people all together (Tagged or not) myself included, and this feature would give people a quick option to check/search if anyone has ever had a s/a (now or in the distant past) and then they could decide from that point if they wanted to continue to do "business" with said user, I don't need to provide links as there is many unresolved s/a's (for example its extremely hard to prove a UaP s/a sufficient proof or not)
e/ also using a med as you suggested would not prevent said item from poofing in the near future
e/ Nor would it help with resale of said item if it was purchased from a user the community has decided is "Bad Mannered" (Sells UaP, Steals, Ect) this option would allow people to do some quick research and decide for themselves.
e/ also I fail to see how adding a search feature to look for a certain username would "promote false accusations" as people can already go and look through this section, just asking for a search feature to make it less time consuming...
This post was edited by Stories on Aug 30 2017 09:34am