Quote (BardOfXiix @ Jul 20 2017 06:07pm)
Cuts up the pot too finely. There should be a sizable reward for the #1.
The more teams you add to the payout, the more finely the pot gets cut up.
Quote (BardOfXiix @ Jul 20 2017 03:30pm)
Pay out 100 fg or so to every team that makes the playoffs, just to incentivize purchasing some of the boarderline teams that don't have a real Super Bowl run, but have a shot at 8-8 or so.
You seem to be on board with the idea of adding more teams to the payout.
Quote (Goodell4President @ Jul 19 2017 11:37pm)
it spaces out rewards and will actually increase the overall pot with more bids on teams that would otherwise go cheap.
If people agree that incentivizing bids is more important than rewarding Super Bowl teams, then it's just a question of how far it should be taken. I posted an example of taking it to the extreme just to illustrate the point.
How many non-Super Bowl teams have to get a payout before the name of the game needs to be changed from 'Super Bowl Auction"?
This post was edited by Kayeto on Jul 20 2017 04:20pm