Motherfucker.

If its based on his prime, kobe was a fking beast and deserves it

I know this forum circle jerk kobe as shit cuz of ciroc and umade though.

You guys mention me in the same sentence and that fucking Ciroc I don't get it. I never blindly homered Kobe and hated on everyone else like that idiot does. I even said Lebron surpassed him already. I'm not an idiot.
Anyways this is off topic.

Nice try ciroc

Umade can have Rohan/Rahul's spot if he sends me 100fg buyin since I initially paid jajaja's

Signed, sealed.

I'm gonna wait for you to confirm that I have indeed taken over his spot (I've sent the fg) before making my selection as it is my pick in the draft.

I confirm on behalf of him, now make ur pick sweden

I'm just wondering guys, how do we compare eras. I mean, we want to win as much as possible in a five year period and the guys we draft are in their prime for five years.
Wilt in his prime scored 50 a game and grabbed like 27 boards as well. How do we translate that to today? Someone picked KAJ at 4. His best years, stat wise, were before Lakers, but he WON more with the Lakers.
So many questions before I make my selection.

I don't think there's a good answer to this. It's a judgment call by whoever is voting. I would imagine they would take into account guys like Russell who has 11 rings played in a league with 8 teams and zero parity for example.

Edit: no bad picks yet.

This post was edited by TUAlumni on Jul 13 2017 04:46am