d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Motor Sports & Cars > Turbo Charged Scion Fr-s
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 2,406
Joined: Mar 2 2015
Gold: 95.99
Warn: 20%
Apr 23 2017 02:11pm
Quote (t9x @ Apr 23 2017 06:18am)
Oh this whole time I thought they came with 300 na

200 is what my 88 trans am 305 came with da fuq


Your 88 TA had 2.5x the displacement lmfao
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Apr 23 2017 03:35pm
Quote (CuttingEdge @ Apr 23 2017 03:11pm)
Your 88 TA had 2.5x the displacement lmfao


And fuel injection from the 80s. This is a ridiculous argument as no one held a gun to toyobaru's head and limited the displacement.
Member
Posts: 2,406
Joined: Mar 2 2015
Gold: 95.99
Warn: 20%
Apr 23 2017 04:18pm
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 23 2017 01:35pm)
And fuel injection from the 80s. This is a ridiculous argument as no one held a gun to toyobaru's head and limited the displacement.


A ridiculous argument against a ridiculous comparison.
Who compares an 88 TA's factory specs to a 2010+ ANYTHING?
Member
Posts: 10,572
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 4.37
Apr 23 2017 05:05pm
Quote (CuttingEdge @ Apr 23 2017 10:18pm)
A ridiculous argument against a ridiculous comparison.
Who compares an 88 TA's factory specs to a 2010+ ANYTHING?



Silly people who only care about hp and torque as deciding factors in buying a car.

This post was edited by stupidkid282 on Apr 23 2017 05:05pm
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Apr 23 2017 06:26pm
Quote (CuttingEdge @ Apr 23 2017 05:18pm)
A ridiculous argument against a ridiculous comparison.
Who compares an 88 TA's factory specs to a 2010+ ANYTHING?


Quote (stupidkid282 @ Apr 23 2017 06:05pm)
Silly people who only care about hp and torque as deciding factors in buying a car.


He's was using it as an example of how woefully underpowered the BRZ is because an 88 Trans Am was slow as balls and made NO power.


Idiots.
Member
Posts: 10,572
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 4.37
Apr 23 2017 06:30pm
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 24 2017 12:26am)
He's was using it as an example of how woefully underpowered the BRZ is because an 88 Trans Am was slow as balls and made NO power.


Idiots.


except, the brz was never intended to be "fast." It's not trying to prove more than what it is......a driver's car. It adopts forced induction just fine for those who want a 400+hp car for $40,000, and at that price point per performance, it's incredible, especially around the track.

This post was edited by stupidkid282 on Apr 23 2017 06:40pm
Member
Posts: 2,406
Joined: Mar 2 2015
Gold: 95.99
Warn: 20%
Apr 23 2017 09:48pm
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 23 2017 04:26pm)
He's was using it as an example of how woefully underpowered the BRZ is because an 88 Trans Am was slow as balls and made NO power.


Idiots.


Pathetic comparison as they're completely different cars built for completely difference purposes.

Outside of the fact that power isn't the only deciding factor on speed.


I'm not saying they're fast, they're slow as balls.
But holy fuck get a better comparison.
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Apr 24 2017 05:34am
Quote (CuttingEdge @ Apr 23 2017 10:48pm)
Pathetic comparison as they're completely different cars built for completely difference purposes.

Outside of the fact that power isn't the only deciding factor on speed.


I'm not saying they're fast, they're slow as balls.
But holy fuck get a better comparison.


It wasn't my comparison.



Quote (stupidkid282 @ Apr 23 2017 07:30pm)
except, the brz was never intended to be "fast." It's not trying to prove more than what it is......a driver's car. It adopts forced induction just fine for those who want a 400+hp car for $40,000, and at that price point per performance, it's incredible, especially around the track.


You are way too easy.
Member
Posts: 15,717
Joined: Aug 20 2007
Gold: 481.00
Apr 24 2017 05:54am
Quote (CuttingEdge @ Apr 23 2017 11:48pm)
Pathetic comparison as they're completely different cars built for completely difference purposes.

Outside of the fact that power isn't the only deciding factor on speed.


I'm not saying they're fast, they're slow as balls.
But holy fuck get a better comparison.


How are they completely different they are actually quite similar

Both were built underpowered and good for turns

Not to mention multiple companies made the same car under different names

You got your birds, your trans am, and your camarows

Weight is basically the same, difference is like 200 lbs which is like a fat guy vs a skinny guy

Similar body design for being almost 20 years apart, and different manufacturers

Camarow can do a 1g turn stock

Hipsters drive brz and have a new age mullet, iroc drivers also have mullets

Brz is basically the reincarnation of a Camarow and frs is a firebird

This post was edited by t9x on Apr 24 2017 06:06am
Member
Posts: 2,406
Joined: Mar 2 2015
Gold: 95.99
Warn: 20%
Apr 24 2017 06:38am
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 24 2017 03:34am)
It wasn't my comparison.





You are way too easy.


You're defending it though.

Quote (t9x @ Apr 24 2017 03:54am)
How are they completely different they are actually quite similar

Both were built underpowered and good for turns

Not to mention multiple companies made the same car under different names

You got your birds, your trans am, and your camarows

Weight is basically the same, difference is like 200 lbs which is like a fat guy vs a skinny guy

Similar body design for being almost 20 years apart, and different manufacturers

Camarow can do a 1g turn stock

Hipsters drive brz and have a new age mullet, iroc drivers also have mullets

Brz is basically the reincarnation of a Camarow and frs is a firebird


I legitimately stopped reading your ENTIRE comment after the first line.


You're either extremely stupid, or a pathetic troll.
Either way I have no desire to discuss comparing a TA to a FRS.
Go Back To Motor Sports & Cars Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll