Quote (Leevee @ Mar 26 2017 04:09pm)
Absolutely nothing.
I believe that, if you are a scientist with any kind of self-awareness, you know that you cannot be atheist or theist. There is simply no information about how the universe was created, and even if we figure this out, it'll only mean that the new question will be: What set this creating force in motion?
In other words;
1. Current question: What created the universe?
2. Someone proves that X created the universe.
3. New question: What created X?
Rinse and repeat. You can even boil this down to questions like "Why does electric charge exist?", "Why does gravity exist?", "What causes particles to have a mass?", etc. Every answer always immediately poses a new question.
Most of all, I hate theists for completely denying this paradox. They say God created the universe, which is fine, but they entirely refuse to even think about what has created God. Instead, they come up with bullshit such as "Before God created time, there was no concept of 'before' and 'after'. So, there is nothing that came before God, for 'before God' is an incorrect way to think about it."
Seeing that generally the question of God's existence is not in the realm of any of the sciences bar theology scientists naturally hold a vast amount of differing opinions on the subject matter.
The "what created the uncreated creator?"-counterargument is weak. If the theistic answer to the question of the origins of being is to posit an uncreated being without a beginning then questioning the origins of the said uncreated being is in no way a counter-argument.