Also that point it brings the question. What makes a scammer? Is there a personality type to it, a maturity factor, etc. I mean you can't as you said lable all scammers as bad people for sure. They did however, do something bad and hurt another member of what's supposed to be a close forum. We're supposed to be a family and even though people argue, you don't steal stuff from other people. So yes I agree mistakes happen and there are a few who are truly sorry but it's a majority factor Joe is going for I think.

Yes you can. Unless they re-paid the scam, I will not give them the benefit of the doubt and continue to label scammers as bad people. That shows a person's true moral identity stealing from other people. Whether it be with forum gold or real life items, it's bad.

This post was edited by JohnMiller92 on Feb 18 2017 05:02pm

I agree it is bad, don't get me wrong. I guess I should have changed my wording. All "previous and current".

You see a scammer tag you know they did bad. In spambams case he did pay and I'm sure he is a very nice person who made a mistake and turned around.

I don't think it changes the fact that they donated to the website is what I am getting at. Case to case discretion of the mod team is my vote. Just putting in my .02$

I am in no way advocating scamming, but pm access removal, gold access removal, and a scammer tag already makes it hard enough if you actually want to put in the work and get it removed.

This post was edited by SpamBam on Feb 18 2017 05:25pm

yes

up

No. they paid 25$ to get entry and was granted access.

Isn't this already how it is, occasionally you see one post who squeezed by, but he gets it removed shortly after. I believe.

nah they have access they dont get removed unless someone see fits but ya usually does not happen.



they get access back once crimes repaid

up