Who is accepting any of it?

Democrats would be less accepting of it (it wouldn't be happening at all) under Hillary, regardless of who is doing the destroying/rioting. Just shows how weak trump is to not put an end to the madness. Under Hillary there'd be none of or they'd rip, as we know, the clintons are feared and respected while trump just gets pooed on. Huehuehue

This post was edited by tommyd323 on Jan 5 2017 12:00am

We're still under Obama.

lol troll gets slammed hard in one sentence.

GG.

Liberals rioted after Trump destroyed Hillary. And police chiefs by and large refused to arrest and shoot rioters because they were mostly black. Stop being studpid

Because rioting/protesting systemic concerns actually makes sense. Why the fuck would anyone riot an isolated incident of something that rioting wouldn't do anything about?

Why would anyone riot this? Why would anyone riot if the races were swapped? Makes zero sense.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jan 5 2017 08:13am

Sure it does... if the roles were reversed this would be an extreme example of how our society does not value black lives as much as white lives. The police commissioners words would be much different, and the media reaction would be much different.

maybe if they didn't commit a disproportionate amount of crime they wouldn't make up a disproportionate amount of deaths in police encounters

michael brown wasn't exactly an innocent angel

This post was edited by duffman316 on Jan 5 2017 09:37am