Quote (Carpe_Diem @ 23 Oct 2016 08:52)

I would agree about Keenum, but he's only had one really good game this season, and it was still a loss. We're already negative now, so what would we have to lose by starting a rookie?
Who knows, Jared could be another Dak. Either way, unless we win the rest of our games this season, it's not a playoff year anyways. So there's really no huge downside, IMO.

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Oct 23 2016 12:53pm)

Exactly. He wasn't quite ready when we were looking like we might be in the hunt and now it'd be dumb to rush him so that we can eke out a 9-7 schedule. This is what I was calling for all offseason and I'm glad to see we're sticking with it. No doubt he'll see some action after the bye week.

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 23 Oct 2016 12:53)

Exactly. He wasn't quite ready when we were looking like we might be in the hunt and now it'd be dumb to rush him so that we can eke out a 9-7 schedule. This is what I was calling for all offseason and I'm glad to see we're sticking with it. No doubt he'll see some action after the bye week.

Quote (LibertyPrime @ 23 Oct 2016 12:54)

i sure am glad i didnt draft girly in FF.

Quote (Carpe_Diem @ Oct 23 2016 12:56pm)

Honestly, I feel like there needs to be one of two rookies played after bye - Goff or Cooper. QB and WR were what hurt us this week, and both of those players are healthy and ready.





No one really cares, tbh

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Oct 23 2016 11:40am)

Keenum getting way too much shit from people glancing at box scores, Tavon brickhanded his way to one INT, Quick failed to run his route for the last INT, the second was another brickhand move.

I'm not saying he was great at all, but he damned near marched it back to tie the game, and would have had a chance if Quick was tuned in. Or Britt? Now I can't remember, lol.