Quote (howtodisappearcompletely @ Aug 21 2016 02:05pm)
I do wonder. To what extent can we allow disabilities that happen to play in someone's advantage, and at which point do we want to disallow it?
Pistorius' artificial "blade" feet were considered to give him an advantage over people with normal feet. Now, imagine if Pistorius were one of the world's best runners, and his blades would help him win every sprint as if it were a walk through the park. Should we have disallowed this?
I'm very much on the fence about this matter.
Going by liberal logic, it depends.
We should let Ronnie Coleman compete in women's weightlifting IF the women competing there are white. If it causes a disadvantage for any minority women then it's a big no-no obviously.
Same in this case. The top 3 "women" here either have testicles, are roided out to all hell, or both:
However, notice the woman that came in fourth place is a fucking WHITE FEMALE FROM CANADA. So, even if she would have come in first if it wasn't for cheaters, it doesn't matter because she's white lol.
So it's perfectly fine in this case. Hope that clears things up.