Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 28 2016 06:56am)
Not an argument? You mean like the last time you posted a fucking god awful hack study where the guy compared a non-traditional small sample size of gay unmarried partners to a larger sample of married traditional families and was criticized by his dept chair and peers? If that's considered making an argument I'd rather just go to heaven and not spread bullshit like its gospel.
Jesus more hackery.... conclusion of researchers, mothers who have a history of child abuse and low income are more likely to abuse than mothers who have neither a history of child abuse or low income. Duh.
Your conclusion. Single parents overwhelmingly beat their children.
jesus....
You should have seen the first round of irrelevant sources (like page 2 or 3) he provided, absolutely painful replying to those. He literally said "abused children more likely to commit crime" and provided 2 links stating individuals with increased MAOA expression due to genotype variation are less likely to commit crime despite being abused.
He said something along the lines of ok I'll find better sources later and then posts these. Some people truly are not worth wasting your time on. Per endlessbabble I'm just a "demotard who is unable to donate to my delusional beliefs and he's already donated 10x more than I will ever donate in my life"
Lmao you can't make this shit up. It is both humorous and scary that individuals so found out can be so arrogant.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 28 2016 07:19am)
you said stats wont change because gays are unfaithful (sans another shit source btw). where's the strawman? or was your post just shit.
He either doesn't know what a strawman is or he's moronic because he does it every other post during linear argumentation
This post was edited by Bazi on Jul 28 2016 07:44am