I understand the "u.s" for destabilizing the middle east. But why france and germany?

it is their religion

1. some western countries have their own historical connections
2. others (actually all western countries) are 'guilty by association'

look like 1.6 billions people are terrorists

Because Bush Sr installed Bin Laden, a foreigner

Because Bill Clinton randomly bombed 500k civilians into oblivion for no reason while he under scrutiny for sexual deviance.

They also unanimously believed 9/11 was a set up on day one so when we invaded their holy land, we declared war on their religion.

Then we stole their drug production under the guise of NATO

Etc.

They [think] they know all the allies are in cahoots, so all the allies who allow the genocide of brown people are all at fault.





We also detained all of their religious leaders and called them terrorists while stacking them and peeing on them


I can actually go on for ever.
Called "collateral damage" it's just damage.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jul 22 2016 09:41pm

Destabilized? So you are implying the Middle East was stable before the second Iraq war?



Why aren't South Americans massacring Europeans or Americans because the United States intervened in their countries?

This post was edited by IceMage on Jul 23 2016 12:36am

Because France and Germany are free, and they are jealous of our freedom. Any opposing argument to this can be considered an act of treason.

it's a fact old europe is now the only true representant of good life and freedom (also maybe some countries like canada or australia)
now it's easier for isis to strike europe too...



https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq

If you can't say it yourself just don't bother.