What if we allocated the most school funding to the least privileged areas?
Instead of subsidizing private schools for billions we start to push money into the ghettos and low productivity areas.
Get the best educators to the students who need them the most.
Would this not see better results than funneling billions towards the middle and upper classes who need it far less?
Discuss.

wich kind of "private" schools exactly are subsidized exactly ?

why and who is going to pay for it?

We should definitely strip funds from schools in good areas with high test scores, they don't need an education much. Let's funnel it to the worst areas in the country, this way we can build up their schools, improve their overall education and when they reach a certain point, we can strip funds from their now good schools and funnel it another failing area, it'll work like a chain.

Sending this to Bernie now.

THAT'S IT I'M A #BERNOUT NOW

In my country all of them.


Good areas get high test scores because the schools have more funding and better teachers with smaller class sizes.
I am not talking about test scores here, i am talking about socio economic situation of the district.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jun 16 2016 03:28am

Step 1: Abolish private schools altogether.
Step 2: Build an education system that focuses on quality instead of profits.
Step 3: Check again whether certain areas have a high number of poorly educated people, and figure out why this is.

Yeah something along these lines.
Minus the abolishment.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jun 16 2016 04:03am

Except the part where parents pay to go to private schools

Other than that..

It's about the distribution of public school funding.

http://www.schoolfundingfairness.org/






I think education should be a federal system, so that we don't have these huge differences in the educations of different states and counties.