Quote (IceMage @ 14 Apr 2016 18:22)
Well sure, but you aren't just taking jobs away from teens. You are taking them away from people who have to work two or three low wage jobs to feed their family. More expensive products, less jobs, doesn't seem good for poor people.
Except the inflation thing is pretty much bullshit. Inflation has gone quite a bit faster than the minimum wage, in fact. It's just a matter of trying to get it to keep up with where it was meant to be in the first place, to make sure that people can actually survive.
In fact, doing a bit of looking, I don't really buy the unemployment bit either. Here's some pretty decent stuff the Department of Labor gathered together:
https://www.dol.gov/featured/minimum-wage/mythbusterIt'll lead to more people who can just keep one job and keep their family afloat, leading to more satisfaction and efficient workers, plus save a bunch of costs associated with turnover and cetera.
Quote (jtf @ 14 Apr 2016 18:24)
I have to imagine that it would help the economy and it's hard for me to really reason out the opposing point of view. Forces innovation in automation? Sounds like a good thing. All those people who hang around my office and kinda do work but are mostly worthless will be forced into being productive? Sounds like a good thing again. But when we talk about the economy, we're talking about money spent on american goods and services, and increasing minimum wage will force wealth from wealthier people to poorer people, and poorer people spend much more of their money on american goods and services than wealthier people, so sounds like a good thing.
Exactly. That's the most important bit - the poor spend money a lot more efficiently, so there's also all the extra economic activity from people who can afford to get all economically active. And like I said above, automation is coming in any case.
This post was edited by AiNedeSpelCzech on Apr 14 2016 08:30pm