I've never bought fg so I don't even know what happens, but I suppose? As long as they cancel before the time they receive their fg I don't see it being an issue. If they don't, that's the risk they take forgetting to cancel after signing up for recurring payments. He's not suggesting all payments become recurring, just those you sign up for.

Reoccurring payment doesn't have a place for this type of business model and would create more issues for Paul and the staff.

No

Yes, let's add a subscription to jsp now lol
No thanks

Not going to happen.
Although for those that do spend $10 a month on here would find it useful.

Voted no to avoid paypal chargeback problems.

Vote yes, even though I wouldn't use it, the perks don't really benefit me much

People already complain that they lose FG here and there (post searches, buying too many raffle tickets, topic title features) because they're too dumb or lazy to read things properly
Some people even buy that FG with $ and the answer every time is simply a "sorry no refunds, should have read it properly"
I'm sure if they made it apparent that there's no refunds for forgetting to cancel, then it'd be your own fault for not doing so
If people charge back or whatever through PayPal, they should just get locked or banned



It's already a subscription in a way if you spend $10 every month for the customer perks
He's just suggesting something that would facilitate doing that

Legally no contract is needed for ucc below 500 if I remember correctly so it could work. Really depends as above what merchant services he uses as charge back issues tho

Best if no, avoids issues

omfgz $10 issue
omg no

useful, ofc
for me, no.

Pandora, Amazon Prime, Spotify, Every insurance under the sun, my mortgage, my car payment, my electric bill, my Comcast bill, my Sirius XM bill, and every other subscription I have all take recurring payments.

I vote yes, this is a no brainer. Especially if it's an option and not a default setting. Makes it simple as shit for the people who want it to be recurring, and for those who don't, don't have to.

Great suggestion.

This post was edited by AspenSniper on Apr 13 2016 10:55am

voted yes, good idea.

edit: assuming recurring payments causes more issues than one-time payments is faulty. if a customer is going to dispute a charge, they are going to dispute a recurring charge just like they will dispute a one-time charge.

This post was edited by Markro on Apr 21 2016 12:47pm