d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Historicity Of Jesus > Ehrman V Price Debate
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Jan 29 2016 11:31am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jan 29 2016 12:05pm)
people thinking bible says the truth about jesus, and nothing else, should not be allowed to do talk about it outside of their ... churches


...this ain't France Jocko...we have both freedom of speech and the freedom to practice our religion in the U.S. of A. !
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jan 29 2016 12:14pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ 29 Jan 2016 17:16)
Serious question Viv, if you're so convinced that Christianity is fable, why is there a need to constantly invest your time in watching these debates?


Well... I am very interested in History as an academic subject. I enjoy debating in general and I believe that the standards we apply to the validity of most historical claims have not been applied to Jesus.

I'm not convinced that Christianity is a fable. I'm not even convinced that Jesus of Nazareth was not a single historical figure. What I am convinced of is that there is not enough evidence to say that he definitely was and that he falls short of the mark that other figures (Robin Hood is a good example) have been considered likely mythological for not meeting.

It's a subject I find interesting is all. I simply think it's one of the few areas within Christian apologetics and the History of Christianity where there is potential for both a massive shift in opinion and where further debate could actually poduce something meaningful. Unlike regular apologetics like the conmanship of WLC or the continuous ranting of Dawkins where we've hit a bit of a brick wall where there can be very little shift in opinion.

I think the Historicity of Jesus is something that a lot of people haven't given much serious thought - they have just accepted it as fact without examining the evidence or hearing the arguments for and against. I also believe that the arguments against are convincing enough to cause the aforementioned shift in opinion should they be more widely discussed.

Quote (IceMage @ 29 Jan 2016 16:29)
Watch a couple non-Christians debate the historicity of Christ?

http://img.pandawhale.com/61660-Nope-Octopus-gif-d5cN.gif


Ehrman is not Christian simply because he actually studied Christianity. If you were interested in the truth you would be interested in his point of view.

This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 29 2016 12:22pm
Member
Posts: 66,069
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 29 2016 12:20pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ 29 Jan 2016 18:31)
...this ain't France Jocko...we have both freedom of speech and the freedom to practice our religion in the U.S. of A. !


you can practice until it's not interfering with normal people
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Jan 29 2016 12:33pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jan 29 2016 01:20pm)
you can practice until it's not interfering with normal people


....and the best part is you don't get to make our laws...your opinion on religious freedom and free speech in America makes no difference whatsoever . :banana:
Member
Posts: 66,069
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 29 2016 12:43pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ 29 Jan 2016 19:33)
....and the best part is you don't get to make our laws...your opinion on religious freedom and free speech in America makes no difference whatsoever . :banana:


trying to sort out fake beliefs and true history fact isnt a task for religious people, especially those we can find in "usa", mostly mixing business, political campaign, and various sins in the name of J.

Not to mention the lies, propaganda, intoxications, diversion, in the name of "freedom of speech" in a country where medias are controlled by a some lobbysts. You can put your "laws" in your NSA hole.
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Jan 29 2016 12:48pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jan 29 2016 01:43pm)
trying to sort out fake beliefs and true history fact isnt a task for religious people, especially those we can find in "usa", mostly mixing business, political campaign, and various sins in the name of J.

Not to mention the lies, propaganda, intoxications, diversion, in the name of "freedom of speech" in a country where medias are controlled by a some lobbysts. You can put your "laws" in your NSA hole.


...you are spinning your wheels son , pissing into the wind or as they say in Froggyland "c'est comme si on pissait dans un violon" . If you don't like our laws stay home .
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jan 29 2016 12:56pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jan 29 2016 11:16am)
Serious question Viv, if you're so convinced that Christianity is fable, why is there a need to constantly invest your time in watching these debates?


Quote (IceMage @ Jan 29 2016 11:22am)
Any theories?


It can't be that he's the center of the most numerous religion in the world. You're basically asking why I'd like to read about the history of alchemy even though I'm a chemist.
Member
Posts: 66,069
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 29 2016 01:04pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ 29 Jan 2016 19:48)
...you are spinning your wheels son , pissing into the wind or as they say in Froggyland "c'est comme si on pissait dans un violon" . If you don't like our laws stay home .


you better call me sir, and in anyway know im glad of the temple cleansing.
Member
Posts: 19,898
Joined: May 10 2009
Gold: 1.50
Jan 29 2016 01:14pm
Are you saying the corpse I have been conditioned to worship from birth, may just be a complete fabrication?!

Boy is my face red.
Member
Posts: 33,479
Joined: Feb 7 2009
Gold: 1,341.48
Warn: 10%
Jan 29 2016 01:15pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jan 29 2016 10:08am)
I never made either claim. If I'm going to watch another debate on the historicity of Christ one of my Christian brothers better be involved. Otherwise, it's just darkness fighting darkness.


Smh..
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll