d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Hammonds, Bundys, Oathkeepers, Militias
12323Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 61,375
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 10.77
Jan 3 2016 07:25pm
I'm pretty much in favor of everything the Oathkeeps have to say about the developing situation in Oregon as well as the Bundy Ranch situation. Militias defending against another Waco is about the most legitimate 2nd Amendment thing I can even think of.

"We went to Bundy Ranch after the Bundy family directly asked for help in their strong stand, and we went there specifically to prevent them from being “Waco’d” after we saw clear preparation and intent by the Feds to use military trained snipers and Special Forces veteran mercenaries against cowboys and their families." - Stewart Rhodes

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Jan 3 2016 07:27pm
Member
Posts: 26,649
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jan 3 2016 07:54pm
if you agree with those lunatics you are an idiot. Taking over federal property by force because they dont wanna pay what they owe for letting their animals graze on public land... They hate the government until it benefits them
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jan 3 2016 07:57pm
Quote (Justise @ Jan 3 2016 07:54pm)
if you agree with those lunatics you are an idiot. Taking over federal property by force because they dont wanna pay what they owe for letting their animals graze on public land... They hate the government until it benefits them


Shhhh you'll get the libertarians in here making excuses for 10 pages
Member
Posts: 45,863
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
Jan 3 2016 07:58pm
We need a #whitegunsmatter movement to protect our rights from obama's tyranny
Member
Posts: 66,027
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 3 2016 08:32pm
i read about that story the initial reason was 2 guys condemned for 5 years for poaching and then arson on 100 acres to eraze proofs ...

is that true ?
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 3 2016 09:06pm
Why does the federal government need to own 53% of Oregon?
Member
Posts: 66,027
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 3 2016 09:36pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ 4 Jan 2016 04:06)
Why does the federal government need to own 53% of Oregon?


could play their game, send all them into somalia and distribute their land in national lottery.
Member
Posts: 13,313
Joined: May 20 2004
Gold: 253.00
Jan 3 2016 10:39pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jan 3 2016 09:32pm)
i read about that story the initial reason was 2 guys condemned for 5 years for poaching and then arson on 100 acres to eraze proofs ...

is that true ?



I don't know enough to form an opinion but from what I read they where arrested for doing an "unauthorized" control burn to protect their winter feed from wild fires in 2001. Federal firefighters saw them and the fires they set spread to public land under the control of the BLM. The big stink about this is they where already convicted and served a year in jail and now the courts have thrown that sentence out and imposed a new one of 5 years. That part seems shady as fuck. I did also read the story of how they supposedly massacred a deer heard and set the fire to cover the evidence but I don't know if they where convicted for poaching.
Member
Posts: 66,027
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 3 2016 10:46pm
Quote (tman65ky @ 4 Jan 2016 05:39)
I don't know enough to form an opinion but from what I read they where arrested for doing an "unauthorized" control burn to protect their winter feed from wild fires in 2001. Federal firefighters saw them and the fires they set spread to public land under the control of the BLM. The big stink about this is they where already convicted and served a year in jail and now the courts have thrown that sentence out and imposed a new one of 5 years. That part seems shady as fuck. I did also read the story of how they supposedly massacred a deer heard and set the fire to cover the evidence but I don't know if they where convicted for poaching.


oh thanks for answer !
allright so it's not that clear... People are massively talking about the consequences but not about the source of the problem itself, really weird.
Member
Posts: 13,313
Joined: May 20 2004
Gold: 253.00
Jan 3 2016 10:50pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jan 3 2016 11:46pm)
oh thanks for answer !
allright so it's not that clear... People are massively talking about the consequences but not about the source of the problem itself, really weird.



a lot of people are griping that its the same situation that happened in Nevada ref the grazing rights etc and its not. I think these people have a legitimate gripe this time but the action they've taken....extreme to say the least. This will not end well for them especially if they start shooting. I can assure you that the BLM will not come under gunned/manned this time.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12323Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll