Quote (duffman316 @ 28 Sep 2015 14:53)
chris, the hypocrisy would be in permitting one set of holidays which have admittedly religious connotations because you identify with them, while denying another set of religious holidays on the grounds that you do not personally identify with them
No... You don't see hypocrisy in purging one religion out of a system with the ideal of 'no religion in government' only for them to allow for acknowledgement of another religion's holiday?
It is to me O.o
Surely you see the nuances that create the hypocritical situation..... Sure it is for easier cultural assimilation but imo schools are not the place to do so....
Quote (Bazi @ 28 Sep 2015 14:54)
It is not "or" it is both. It is now cultural habit because the majority of the country is Christian and as a society elected to take Christian holidays off for several generations. If this tradition was suddenly halted, the majority of the country would be in uproar. Not because of the a halted tradition, but rather because we no longer celebrate Christmas and Easter as public holidays. According to your view it just so happens by coincidence we are already off 2+ cumulative weeks for those days for potentially, solely, "cultural reasons", therefore cannot count them as Christian holidays. This is an erroneous view. The hypocrisy argument has weight if you traded holidays, not merely adding another one one.
Considering they don't give those days off because they are religious holidays, but because they are simply what our culture has been doing for a long time which creates the norms that would make people cause the uproar they would if they canceled them. If they gave those days off in a religious sense, then added the other religion, then it is simply equality. But taking away the religious intonation, then adding another holiday which has a religious intonation is surely hypocritical... I don't see why you guys don't see it that way.
This post was edited by ChrisKz on Sep 28 2015 12:59pm