Bill O Reilly seems to think there's a downside. Can you think of one?

'Gender deficiency' lol.

How does this man still have a job?

This post was edited by Scaly on Feb 26 2015 12:56pm

Tense negotiations every 28 days?

Well, considering he framed the conversation by talking about deficiencies men might have, I don't really see a problem with the discussion.

I'm guessing you have a problem because transgender's feel self-conscious when people speak about typical male/female behavior or characteristics.

This post was edited by IceMage on Feb 26 2015 01:02pm

...spouses of former President's should not be allowed to hold the office ; unfortunately the founding fathers could not fathom the concept of female office holders so it was never addressed . If we ever have another Constitutional Convention the matter should be put forward as an amendment .

Women are not biologically fit for leadership positions, science and history can give a foundation for argument there, culturally this is seen in every society ad s well

sons
brothers

perfectly ok though



thatcher

This post was edited by duffman316 on Feb 26 2015 01:19pm

..yup , even daughters and sisters but not spouses . The same would hold true if a woman was President , her husband should not be allowed to hold the office .

what do you hope to prevent by not permitting spouses to hold office that would not happen with allowing their children to hold the same position?

ill give that a solid 3/10 for a trollgrade, try harder next time