Gerner's Photo Log - Topic

Fashionkiller

Member

Posts: 5,108

Joined: Jul 28 2014

Gold: 14.00

#21

Jun 24 2015 05:37pm

Quote (Gerner @ Jun 23 2015 06:41am)

Yes, det er jeg nemlig. ;-)

Absolut fede billeder! Add mig

Gerner

Member

Posts: 26,568

Joined: Dec 17 2007

Gold: 0.00

#22

Jul 12 2015 07:39am

Heres comes a few shots taken today. :-)

Gerner

Member

Posts: 26,568

Joined: Dec 17 2007

Gold: 0.00

#23

Jul 12 2015 07:54am

Might have to post my pics in a smaller size..

Gerner

Member

Posts: 26,568

Joined: Dec 17 2007

Gold: 0.00

#24

Jul 13 2015 11:48am

p0sitive

Member

Posts: 12,805

Joined: Sep 15 2005

Gold: 2,002.41

#25

Jul 13 2015 01:58pm

You should try to upload smaller images. It is difficult to view the photo without having to scroll up and down. Keep up the photo log though!

This post was edited by p0sitive on Jul 13 2015 02:15pm

Gerner

Member

Posts: 26,568

Joined: Dec 17 2007

Gold: 0.00

#26

Jul 13 2015 11:52pm

Quote (p0sitive @ Jul 13 2015 08:58pm)

You should try to upload smaller images. It is difficult to view the photo without having to scroll up and down. Keep up the photo log though!

What size would you recommend?

Canadian_Man

Member

Posts: 35,075

Joined: Jul 26 2006

Gold: 125.00

#27

Jul 14 2015 02:55am

Quote (Gerner @ Jul 13 2015 10:52pm)

What size would you recommend?

1200 width, 800 height (or thereabouts depending on ratios)

might be a good resolution if you want to stay big, but not too big

This post was edited by Canadian_Man on Jul 14 2015 02:55am

Gerner

Member

Posts: 26,568

Joined: Dec 17 2007

Gold: 0.00

#28

Jul 14 2015 07:11am

Quote (Canadian_Man @ Jul 14 2015 09:55am)

1200 width, 800 height (or thereabouts depending on ratios)

might be a good resolution if you want to stay big, but not too big

Got some pictures which have to be edited later today, so might try a lower resolution.

Sitting on a very slow PC at the moment, and I see the problem about the size.. ;-)

Thanks.

Wondering if a new objective could do me any good? I'm stock with the std. 18-55 non SF canon objective.. I'm looking on the 50mm / 1.8f Canon Objective because of the very low price.
Already got a Tamron 70-300 AF..

p0sitive

Member

Posts: 12,805

Joined: Sep 15 2005

Gold: 2,002.41

#29

Jul 14 2015 07:35am

Quote (Gerner @ Jul 14 2015 08:11am)

Got some pictures which have to be edited later today, so might try a lower resolution. :)
Sitting on a very slow PC at the moment, and I see the problem about the size.. ;-)

Thanks.

Wondering if a new objective could do me any good? I'm stock with the std. 18-55 non SF canon objective.. I'm looking on the 50mm / 1.8f Canon Objective because of the very low price.
Already got a Tamron 70-300 AF.. :)

Cant go wrong with a fast prime such as the 50mm 1.8. However, based on the photos you've posted here, I think a 35mm prime will be more suitable for your style.

Also, keep in mind that a 50mm on an APS-C camera will have an effective focal length of 80mm.

Gerner

Member

Posts: 26,568

Joined: Dec 17 2007

Gold: 0.00

#30

Jul 14 2015 01:05pm

Quote (p0sitive @ Jul 14 2015 02:35pm)

I don't really know what my "style" is at the moment.. I'm still trying some different shots.
The 50mm aren't a huge cost, so might just start with one of them, and perhaps that will lead me to my own style.

Here's some new pictures, and a way smaller resolution.

Go Back To Photography Topic List