Quote (Scaly @ 19 Jan 2015 01:31)
Yea...
Sure beyond reasonable doubt. I would say think of it like a court case -
Is god guilty of existing?
Guilty - Gnostic Theist
Reasonable doubt - Agnostic Theist/Atheist (depending on what you believe but cannot rationally justify beyond reasonable doubt)
Definitely not Guilty - Gnostic Atheist
People talking about 'truth' in a religious way or a deeply philosophical way seem to mean 'absolute truth' and if we go deep enough it is true that everything is subjective and we cannot 'know' anything but I don't believe that absolute truth is relevant to a rational discussion about our reality.
I guess you could say gnosticism is not 'knowledge' but a claim of knowledge.
I think I'd like to slightly revise this statement due to a mistake that, upon reflection, I believe I've made.
Because agnosticism is the appearance of reasonable doubt and theism is the position that there is a god I don't believe it is possible to be an agnostic theist.
This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 18 2015 10:31pm