http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2912037/Anti-terror-raid-Belgian-town-centre-leaves-three-dead.html

The one thing I don't understand is why we're allowing people who have left to fight with terrorist groups elsewhere back into our countries...

It would be racialist to have sensible immigration restrictions, no one has the bollocks to say the obvious, people with beliefs like your are in charge and that has always been the primary reason for fear based negligence.

What an utterly stupid thing to say. I just expressed my beliefs in the OP and if the people who were in charge shared the belief that people who have left our countries to fight alongside terrorists should not be allowed to return then they wouldn't be allowed to return.

If the people in power had my other beliefs then there wouldn't be any religious people left outside of detention centres.

This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 17 2015 08:35am

Over-socialized ideologies like yours, built on shaming others into submission for deviating from politically correct modes of thought are the exact reason Europe today suffers from retarded policies on immigration, everyone is too scared to say the obvious. You might be against this specific fault of your country but you still refuse to acknowledge why things are this way and that shame based practices are to blame.

So a question for the Europeans here, those who believe in arbitrary concepts of equality, justice, and power of the peasantry through voting and consuming.

Which of these two is more important for your fantasy of a tolerant modern Europe?

• Treating every Muslim the same, ignoring their widespread radical elements.
  ~ or ~
• Implementing discrimination in a way to safeguard against obvious radicalism.

This post was edited by j0ltk0la on Jan 17 2015 10:00am

It just gets stupider and stupider. What kind of 'politically correct mode of thought' advocates the internment of people purely based on their religion?

Don't try and project your preconceptions of what European ideology is like onto me while simultaneously ignoring the beliefs I have just professed that are the exact opposite of those ideologies. It's like you're reading from a badly written 'how to troll euros' script while not adapting it to incorporate my replies. Are we even having a conversation right now or are you just copy/pasting arbitrarily from 4chan?

This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 17 2015 10:13am

I am not talking about your specific beliefs on the religious, I'm talking about your mode of thought as a leftist who uses shame based tactics as a core in argument, look at your attack on people you perceive as racialist, then think of it on a societal level. People scared to express their thoughts in public for fear of being ostracized, try and think of concepts higher than yourself for more than a minute you little narcissist. If you can't keep up with me in an argument on simple concepts then maybe I should write a bot to reply to you so I don't waste my time typing out my thoughts.

'shame based tactics' ? Is that a Bill O'Reilly soundbite? What the fuck does that even mean?

If you're addressing me and then begin a sentence with 'Over socialised ideologies like yours' how the fuck is it narcissistic to assume you're talking about my ideology? If you're incapable of communicating your thoughts unambiguously then obviously I won't 'keep up with you' because I'm not a fucking mind reader. It would be nice if you actually did 'type out your thoughts' in a way that allows other people to know what they are. Then I can begin addressing how ridiculous those thoughts are.

What attack on people I 'percieive as racialist'? What the fuck are you even talking about? Who the fuck are you calling a leftist? What fucking planet are you living on and who the fuck do you think you're talking to? Because you seem to be making a whole load of assumptions about what ideology I identify with and getting them pretty much all flat-out wrong.

This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 17 2015 10:29am

Forget it, you are incapable of following along or even juggling foreign concepts, maybe we ought to apply Europe's immigration policies to your beliefs.

I don't either. I know there was the plight of radicalized individuals who went to fight who thought it was going to be more romantic but it sucked when they got there, or it wasn't what they thought it was, or they just didn't have the type of stomach for military work.

Either way they should be put in chains when they get back and made an example out of in most cases. Treason is serious.

Oh I see. So when you were saying 'your ideology' what you actually meant was 'the one ideology followed by every country in Europe'. How silly of me.



Maybe...

the way I look at it is if you leave the country you live in expressly for the purpose of essentially waging a holy war against that country then you're obviously a danger to that country and it's bloody ridiculous to let you return to it and live freely among the general populace.

This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 17 2015 07:36pm