ever looked at polling on views of violence in Western nations?

did you check out the parts about "attacks on civilians in US" or "attacks on US civilians working in Islamic countries"?
i so want to see what polling about "attacks on Americans" done in Serbia or Russia would say and if people would be willing to associate said data with Orthodoxy.


now to quote what was asked
"al Gaeda goal: getting US to withdraw forces from Islamic countries." "Al Qaeda goal: get US to stop favoring Israel" "Al Qaeda goal: tet US to stop supporting Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan"
damn it Viv, you might just be sympathetic to Al Gaeda


seeing that around 75% of Egyptian Muslims supported religious freedom this might seem like a contradiction, but do make note of the difference between "major apostasy" and "minor apostasy" - the first being essentially becoming an apostate-terrorist (apostasy + high treason), although the major schools' medieval interpretations do agree with death penalty for apostasy. can't tell that much from the data, but why the part about freedom of religion was left out baffles me.
it should be noted that the last reigning seriously taken caliphs actually removed all punishment for all forms of apostasy.
now as for whether it is a problem with Islam i would be interested to know why the data regarding Turkey (89% opposed from a population of 75 million) and Indonesia (77% opposed out of a population of 205 million) was left out.


funny, in Finland it's illegal to insult Christianity (or Islam). Russia passed a similar law just a few years back, but remembering the extent of your russophobia that probs doesn't matter.


Harris is unique in the way that his inanity isn't restricted to just one field, but that he seems to be able to be consistently wrong regardless of what he says.


well seeing that you actually just posted a whole wall of statistical manipulation i really don't see this happening, especially when the same brave sirs that are the first to blast out propaganda like this (it really is like classical propaganda) are often also the first ones to tell the average Muslim about how the said Muslims aren't in fact real Muslims.

when you go around killing civilians in 3rd world countries and don't even bother to keep a body count because it's "collateral damage", people are going to want terrible things to happen to you

surprised the number from palestine isn't 100%

this has nothing to do with islam and everything to do with american foreign policy

This post was edited by duffman316 on Nov 17 2014 08:13am

no, but I think religion is responsible for too much hate and murder on both sides of the fence







not ignorable yet still very much a minority compared to the entire Muslim community

Why do you think that Islam needs to reform to fit in with Western values, and are you actually condoning a form of political or religious genocide to keep the Western societies safe from Muslims? All because of the actions of the extreme radicals?

Virtually all of these polls are American-centric, and not indicative of "western civilization" as a whole. Opinions on whether the US deserve attacks by the world's Muslims can extend well beyond theological reasons.

Holy slapt.



Ssh with your reasons and logic. MORE BLUNT EMOTIONAL RESPONSE.

...to be fair Muslims in London get away with crap that would never be tolerated here . They actually patrol the streets at night castigating non-muslims for their drinking , short skirts and open displays of homosexuality . They would never pull this nonsense against an armed populace .

Cause Hollywood is a big left-wing circle jerk.

The left likes nothing more than appeal to popularity.