Quote (thundercock @ Sep 10 2014 12:02am)
I have a really really really really hard time believing that. I'd imagine that ANY administration would take electoral consequences into consideration when enacting policy.
You need look no further than at what actually happened. It's not difficult. The White House was told in no uncertain terms that acting alone on immigration would present certain electoral challenges, and then the White House
doubled down on its declaration to go it alone on immigration; pushing the gas to the floor by saying that they'd act before the summer was up.
The White House simply didn't care that its action(s) would come with political consequences because it felt like it was right on policy and that politics would eventually follow. It's debatable whether or not that would have actually happened, but there's simply no ignoring the actual events here.
Quote (Santara @ Sep 10 2014 12:11am)
Oh, don't mind him. He's in his own bubble-verse, spewing fantasies/spin/outright lies willy-nilly. Everyone knows Barry is very shrewd, he's outmaneuvered the Republicans pretty much his entire presidency. The only possible way one could claim he didn't care about the electoral consequences is if he weren't shrewd.
Well, no, I live in the world where we actually understand what happens in government and why. You on the other hand know little to nothing about what happens in government and why, so you have to resort to (poor) assumptions since you are a spectator, and not a particularly observant or competent one at that.