Quote (2sexy4u @ 8 Aug 2014 17:31)
1. These claims have not been backed up by independent reporting from international journalists covering the war from Gaza. Instead, dispatches from the ground have presented complex reasons why some residents did not evacuate from Shujai'iya and other areas targeted by the IDF. Many said nowhere in Gaza was safe, so they saw little point in abandoning their homes.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/24/gaza-hamas-fighters-military-bases-guerrilla-war-civilians-israel-idf2.
He does not mention the ceasefire, only pointing that each sides are continuing to fight, witch is right, i dont know how you can get confused here.
3. just mentioning a fact, maybe obvious for you but i had no clue how many troops were deployed, i guess there is more now that at the moment who he made the reporting.
4. It is not required to make a review of the history each time someone makes a report, my ancestor were massacred by english and i have to hate against there descendants, there is a time were you have to turn the page and look to the present if you want to end a war
5. no, please read 1. again
6. Nothing should be ignored, but we need real proof for something your country use as an excuse to murder families
biasedInclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair
clearly not, he is only reporting facts that you dont like to hear about, lack of neutrality is more appropriate there like i mentioned.
The Reporter who was reporting from a some hood in Gaza had a launch right behind him.
The image I posted of a retarded person who were chained to a wall inside a building.
Which my friend himself released him.
They found a Hamas Manual of how to use civilian population... this video sources are clearly worth nothing.
2.He did mention the ceasefire and the fact that he did not mention that Hamas was the one that keeps shooting he failed to be none biased.
3.fact about what? how is it relevant? He was trying to show Israelis are aggressive.
4. It is require to discuss the history pre Hamas attack which clearly shows that for 13 years people sat in shelters.
and that Israel was very patient towards those idiots.
5.The are many proofs that Hamas uses people as human shields and several journalists who went out of Gaza discuss about it.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/08/07/conclusive-proof-that-hamas-uses-palestinians-as-human-shields/http://www.idfblog.com/blog/2014/08/04/captured-hamas-combat-manual-explains-benefits-human-shields/http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/183782#.U-Tx7fmSx8Ehttp://nypost.com/2014/08/05/hamas-manual-details-civilian-death-plan-israel/http://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/Journalists-threatened-by-Hamas-for-reporting-use-of-human-shields-369619http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/183750#.U-TyI_mSx8EWant more?
6.he ignores the facts.
7. Inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair
Exactly.
This post was edited by Many_Names on Aug 8 2014 09:53am