d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Incest > Should It Be Against The Law?
1239Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 48,563
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Jul 12 2014 04:42pm
Quote
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...e-a-taboo.html

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

"A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now 'available', not having [a] sexual partner," the judge said.

"If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you'd invariably have, they would say it's unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone."

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."

The comments were labelled misogynistic and "completely disgraceful" by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge.

"The reference to abortion is particularly repellent," she said.

Dr Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved.

"The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal," she told The Sydney Morning Herald.


The slope is getting a little slippery.
Member
Posts: 24,488
Joined: Jul 11 2011
Gold: 1,272.50
Jul 12 2014 04:44pm
If you're a naturalist, you have no foundation/weight for an argument :D

This post was edited by HighschoolTurd on Jul 12 2014 04:44pm
Member
Posts: 51,221
Joined: Jun 3 2010
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 50%
Jul 12 2014 04:45pm
thats enough internet for today
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Jul 12 2014 04:47pm
...the innate power that comes with being a parent or older sibling should be more than enough to keep it illegal .
Member
Posts: 31,203
Joined: Sep 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jul 12 2014 04:50pm
Shame on this judge. Homosexuality is nothing like incest. Comparing the two is ridiculous, especially when abortion is used as the justification. This really puts victims of incest by parents or older siblings at serious risk.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 12 2014 04:58pm
The state should not be the arbitrator of love.
Member
Posts: 48,563
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Jul 12 2014 05:02pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 12 2014 05:58pm)
The state should not be the arbitrator of love.


Two consenting adults should be able to do what they want, amirite?
Member
Posts: 70,460
Joined: Dec 16 2011
Gold: 281,260.50
Jul 12 2014 05:04pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 12 2014 07:02pm)
Two consenting adults should be able to do what they want, amirite?


i agree

insect is ok of doesn't imply minors of course

or forced unions



Member
Posts: 24,488
Joined: Jul 11 2011
Gold: 1,272.50
Jul 12 2014 05:05pm
Quote (2sexy4u @ 12 Jul 2014 16:04)
i agree

insect is ok of doesn't imply minors of course

or forced unions


lol...
Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Jul 12 2014 05:13pm
Quote (sylvannos @ Jul 12 2014 04:50pm)
Shame on this judge. Homosexuality is nothing like incest. Comparing the two is ridiculous, especially when abortion is used as the justification. This really puts victims of incest by parents or older siblings at serious risk.


Both are dysfunctional behaviors. Neither produce healthy offspring. No reason to outlaw only some paraphilia and tolerate others.
Homosexuality is no more a healthy pattern of behavior than incest and neither of these are part of positive human development.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
1239Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll