d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Hunter Harassment & Animal Rights > What Do You Think
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 12,391
Joined: Nov 19 2008
Gold: 2,004.00
Nov 28 2012 11:42am
Animal rights' group harasses hunters with remote controlled helicopter, hunters shoot it down.

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Flying-Camera-From-Animal-Rights-Group-Shot-Down-at-Pigeon-Shoot-Cops-179983451.html?dr

Quote
SHowing Animals Respect and Kindness (SHARK) are in the midst of a campaign against the Wing Pointe commercial hunting grounds in Hamburg, Berks County and its live pigeon shoots in which the birds are shot down. SHARK began to use an “Octocopter,” a remote controlled flying machine with a high tech video camera, to secretly record the pigeon shoots as they happen.

Quote
The drone, nicknamed “Angel,” was recording a live pigeon shoot on Sunday around 3 p.m. when investigators say it was suddenly struck by gunfire.

SHARK claimed “a single sharp rifle crack rang out,” in a press release sent out on Monday. The group says the camera’s video feed was terminated and the drone went out of control before it was manually brought down. The gunshot caused around $4,000 in damage to the camera, according to SHARK.

State Police are investigating the incident. SHARK claims this is the fourth time the drone has been shot at while trying to spy on what they claim are inhumane pigeon shoots.


:rofl:
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Nov 28 2012 11:47am
Well yes, pigeon shoots are particularly cruel and foul. Hopefully whoever shot at their property gets properly punished.

I'm all for hunting, of course, but there's a difference between hunting and being a complete fucking dildo to prove your 'mastery' over animals.
Member
Posts: 12,391
Joined: Nov 19 2008
Gold: 2,004.00
Nov 28 2012 11:58am
Pennsylvania (where this incident took place) does have a hunter harassment law:

Quote
(a) General rule.--Except as otherwise provided in this title, it is unlawful for another person at the location where the activity is taking place to intentionally obstruct or interfere with the lawful taking of wildlife or other activities permitted by this title.

(a.1) Activities which violate section.--A person violates this section when he intentionally or knowingly:

(1) drives or disturbs wildlife for the purpose of disrupting the lawful taking of wildlife where another person is engaged in the process of lawfully taking wildlife or other permitted activities;

(2) blocks, impedes or otherwise harasses another person who is engaged in the process of lawfully taking wildlife or other permitted activities;

(3) uses natural or artificial visual, aural, olfactory or physical stimuli to affect wildlife behavior in order to hinder or prevent the lawful taking of wildlife or other permitted activities;

(4) creates or erects barriers with the intent to deny ingress or egress to areas where the lawful taking of wildlife or other permitted activities may occur;

(5) interjects himself into the line of fire;

(6) affects the condition or placement of personal or public property intended for use in the lawful taking of wildlife or other permitted activities in order to impair its usefulness or prevent its use;

(7) enters or remains upon public lands or upon private lands without permission of the owner or their agent, with intent to violate this section; or

(8) fails to obey the order of any officer whose duty it is to enforce any of the laws of this Commonwealth where such officer observes any conduct which violates this section or has reasonable grounds to believe that any person intends to engage in such conduct.

(b) Enforcement and recovery of damages.--The commission or any person who is lawfully engaged in the taking, hunting or trapping of game or wildlife who is directly affected by a violation of this section may bring an action to restrain conduct declared unlawful in this section and to recover damages.

(c) Exceptions.--The conduct declared unlawful in this section does not include any activities arising from lawful activity by other land uses, including farming, mining, forestry practices, recreation or any other activities when it is evident that such activities are not intended to violate this section.

(d) Penalties.--A violation of this section is a summary offense of the second degree.

CREDIT(S)

1986, July 8, P.L. 442, No. 93, § 1, effective July 1, 1987. Amended 1992, May 28, P.L. 262, No. 45, § 1, effective July 1,1992.

Member
Posts: 12,391
Joined: Nov 19 2008
Gold: 2,004.00
Nov 28 2012 12:00pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Nov 28 2012 12:47pm)
Well yes, pigeon shoots are particularly cruel and foul.


Save a pigeon, shoot a drone.
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Nov 28 2012 12:01pm
Oh my God, people who are trying to stop cruel and inhumane practices might have broken a law?! Never mind, it's totally not worth protesting against something shitty if you're going to break a law while you do it.

Though I don't see anything in there about recording people, and there's no way that they were scaring off the pigeons, since they're kept in caged until they get launched off into the air. Can you tell me what part of that law they actually broke, instead of just vomiting up the part of the law that someone else undoubtedly pointed out toward?
Member
Posts: 6,015
Joined: Aug 20 2006
Gold: 24,402.34
Nov 28 2012 12:04pm
If people are going to kill animals just for the sake of killing them, there aren't many better choices than pigeons.
Member
Posts: 51,927
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Nov 28 2012 12:05pm
Quote (ArcticShadow @ Nov 28 2012 12:58pm)
Pennsylvania (where this incident took place) does have a hunter harassment law:


Hunters aren't police though, nor is shooting down the spy drone the appropriate response - even assuming the flight constitutes obstruction/interference.
Member
Posts: 12,391
Joined: Nov 19 2008
Gold: 2,004.00
Nov 28 2012 12:19pm
This isn't the first time the animal rights' group has harassed the hunters with the drone.

The hunters shot down another one of their drones last year. The funniest part is when the hunters cheer after bringing it down.

Here is the footage from that drone:



This post was edited by ArcticShadow on Nov 28 2012 12:28pm
Member
Posts: 9,180
Joined: Apr 21 2011
Gold: 6,666.66
Nov 28 2012 12:26pm
The next logical step is to arm these drones. Lets see what these cowards do when the toy helicopters start to shoot back.
Member
Posts: 61,375
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 10.77
Nov 28 2012 12:33pm
There are hunting laws in place for a reason. People who violate them need to be exposed and punished.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll