d2jsp
Gaming and Trading Community
Gaming and Trading Community
Hourly Raffle
Ladder Slasher
Trade Finder
Photo Gallery
Forum Gold FAQ
Instant Messenger
Help and Rules
Live Streams
Account RecoveryResend Validation Email
Hello, GuestLog InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Graphic Design > Photography > Lenses... Lenses... Blahh!

Add ReplyNew TopicNew Poll
Page 1 of 2 12
PANAM
#1 Jun 16 2012 02:50am
Group: Members
Posts: 7,133
Joined: Sep 19 2007
Gold: 281.50
Everything will be connected to d5mkii so, what you think and why...
in order wich i am willing to buy. If someone will explain me why one or the other is better i might change my mind.

Canon EF 50mm f2.5 Macro - vs - Canon EF 50mm f1.8 MK2 - vs - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens

Canon EF 35mm f2.0 Lens - vs - Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Lens - vs - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-56 IS MkII Lens - vs - Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM


F%&! it all and buy this --> Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L Lens


i forgot to add that im more then sure i will get that 50mm macro but need to know how its working on 5dmkii ;)

This post was edited by PANAM on Jun 16 2012 02:54am
DisconnectYourBrain
#2 Jun 16 2012 11:15am
Group: Members
Posts: 2,771
Joined: Oct 30 2010
Gold: 4,862.16
./care
onepagememory
#3 Jun 16 2012 01:04pm
Group: Members
Posts: 16,951
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 70.00
/pms
jayandnix
#4 Jun 16 2012 01:30pm
Group: Members
Posts: 11,150
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 0.00
well what do you want to shoot?

Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L Lens
would be my choice without a doubt

Canon EF 50mm f2.5 Macro - if you want a macro lens then get a longer focal length, you have to get way to close to your subject with this so when u want to shoot bugs it just wont do 100 f2.8L or the 180 f3.5L
Canon EF 50mm f1.8 MK2 - vs - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens - depends on use and/or budget - personally the 1.8 is good enough

Canon EF 35mm f2.0 Lens - vs - Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Lens - imo 35 is more useful / has more potential but either are great
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-56 IS MkII Lens - vs - Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - i wouldnt concider
jayandnix
#5 Jun 16 2012 01:31pm
Group: Members
Posts: 11,150
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 0.00
sorry double posted

This post was edited by jayandnix on Jun 16 2012 01:49pm
bygdubdiesel
#6 Jun 16 2012 07:43pm
Group: Members
Posts: 34,556
Joined: Jun 8 2008
Gold: 203.69
Warn: 30%
50mm 1.8 sucks dick. I have it and I hate it.
PANAM
#7 Jun 17 2012 01:03am
Group: Members
Posts: 7,133
Joined: Sep 19 2007
Gold: 281.50
Quote (jayandnix @ Jun 16 2012 07:30pm)
well what do you want to shoot?

Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L Lens
would be my choice without a doubt

Canon EF 50mm f2.5 Macro - if you want a macro lens then get a longer focal length, you have to get way to close to your subject with this so when u want to shoot bugs it just wont do 100 f2.8L or the 180 f3.5L
Canon EF 50mm f1.8 MK2 - vs - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens - depends on use and/or budget - personally the 1.8 is good enough

Canon EF 35mm f2.0 Lens - vs - Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Lens - imo 35 is more useful / has more potential but either are great
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-56 IS MkII Lens - vs - Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - i wouldnt concider


thx, mkiii + 70-200 f2.8 ordered, waiting, wetting my pants
jayandnix
#8 Jun 17 2012 03:39am
Group: Members
Posts: 11,150
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 0.00
Quote (PANAM @ 17 Jun 2012 11:03)
thx, mkiii + 70-200 f2.8 ordered, waiting, wetting my pants


mark 2 or 3?
here u say 3, OP you say 2?

you gonna love that lens its absolutely amazing
PANAM
#9 Jun 17 2012 01:05pm
Group: Members
Posts: 7,133
Joined: Sep 19 2007
Gold: 281.50
3 cus 2 was only display.
jayandnix
#10 Jun 17 2012 02:56pm
Group: Members
Posts: 11,150
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 0.00
Quote (PANAM @ 17 Jun 2012 23:05)
3 cus 2 was only display.


wow nice
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Page 1 of 2 12