d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > RuneScape > Ish
Prev1141214131414141514161761Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 66,871
Joined: Mar 1 2009
Gold: 0.25
Jan 9 2016 04:37pm
Quote (The_Carlton @ Jan 9 2016 05:20pm)
I'm actually training for the first time in a bit, and I don't see any problems in staying here 93-99 RC

A lot of people are pissed that it 'devalues' RC but it's whatever


The game needed it.. the xp rates are shit and lavas are actually kind of expensive to 99 considering the shit xp rates
Member
Posts: 4,700
Joined: Aug 27 2012
Gold: 290.73
Jan 9 2016 09:01pm
Quote (Starcrater @ Jan 9 2016 03:37pm)
The game needed it.. the xp rates are shit and lavas are actually kind of expensive to 99 considering the shit xp rates


no the game did not need a afk method of rc
the game needed a "click intensive" method of rc as advertised.

both of the methods get more exp p/h than natures and astrals.
the game did not need that.
Member
Posts: 11,275
Joined: Aug 23 2011
Gold: 0.20
Jan 9 2016 10:17pm
Quote (EquateQwerty @ Jan 9 2016 11:01pm)
no the game did not need a afk method of rc
the game needed a "click intensive" method of rc as advertised.

both of the methods get more exp p/h than natures and astrals.
the game did not need that.


Yes it did.

Why does it make sense for you to gain 30k xp/hr TOPS when you get perfect click and focusing like hell.
Member
Posts: 4,700
Joined: Aug 27 2012
Gold: 290.73
Jan 9 2016 11:01pm
Quote (iwantthelongestnameever @ Jan 9 2016 09:17pm)
Yes it did.

Why does it make sense for you to gain 30k xp/hr TOPS when you get perfect click and focusing like hell.


because that is how the game used to be and this is a version of what the game used to be.


sorry for spam
get some gains m9

This post was edited by EquateQwerty on Jan 9 2016 11:02pm
Member
Posts: 25,117
Joined: Jun 17 2009
Gold: 6.10
Jan 10 2016 03:17pm


Quote (EquateQwerty @ Jan 10 2016 12:01am)
because that is how the game used to be and this is a version of what the game used to be.


sorry for spam
get some gains m9


its old school, as in started at '06 and went a different way forward than EOC.

nothing says RC should continue to be garbage to level.

This post was edited by Buffjesus on Jan 10 2016 03:18pm
Member
Posts: 29,826
Joined: Jun 23 2007
Gold: 1,000.00
Jan 10 2016 05:47pm
Quote (The_Carlton @ Jan 9 2016 10:20pm)
I'm actually training for the first time in a bit, and I don't see any problems in staying here 93-99 RC

A lot of people are pissed that it 'devalues' RC but it's whatever


tbh i maxed in like 6months averaging 6-8hrs a day
Member
Posts: 5,417
Joined: Apr 29 2014
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jan 10 2016 06:15pm
Keep it up, that cape will look awesome!
Member
Posts: 32,461
Joined: Feb 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jan 11 2016 06:36am


Won't be needing these anymore
Member
Posts: 66,871
Joined: Mar 1 2009
Gold: 0.25
Jan 11 2016 06:54am
Quote (The_Carlton @ Jan 11 2016 07:36am)
http://puu.sh/mrFz0/7e84ca557a.png

Won't be needing these anymore


:rofl: what was the xp per hour doing nats this way?
Member
Posts: 32,461
Joined: Feb 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jan 11 2016 07:19am
Quote (Starcrater @ Jan 11 2016 06:54am)
:rofl: what was the xp per hour doing nats this way?


Like 27-30K, same as Abyss really just it was a lot more afkable

Still too shitty to do though



4786K Xp until 99

27K/h @ Tai Bwo/Abyss = 177h, 6K nats/h = 1063K Nats @ ~236 profit ea = ~250M
45K/h @ Souls = 106h, 1.35K souls/h @ 250e = 35.7M
71H @ Zulrah = ~177M

177h @ Nats = 99RC + 250M
177h at Souls/Zulrah = 99RC + ~213M


Kinda dumb how close they are for how afk Zeah RC is

And seeing as I 100% do not need gold anymore, it's just 106h of afk vs 177h of hating life

This post was edited by The_Carlton on Jan 11 2016 07:23am
Go Back To RuneScape Topic List
Prev1141214131414141514161761Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll