d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Thc Hair Follicle Test Question > Yup
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 6,015
Joined: Jul 9 2008
Gold: 1,900.00
Jan 4 2011 05:50pm
holy jesus i smoke so much i hope i never have to get tested
Member
Posts: 13,305
Joined: Sep 28 2005
Gold: 4.21
Jan 4 2011 10:36pm
Quote (MOMOtheflyingLEMUR @ Jan 4 2011 11:50pm)
holy jesus i smoke so much i hope i never have to get tested


test positive??? for hiv???
Member
Posts: 9,692
Joined: Apr 10 2006
Gold: 19,597.59
Jan 5 2011 05:37pm
Quote (ThurgoodJenkins @ Jan 4 2011 01:45am)
wrong, it will show up if u were in the same room as someone smoking weed.

first there are several different calibers of follicle testing as well as every other kind of testing (swab, test, urine, blood etc). you must realize that for the substance to show up in your test at all it must be present in the sample. can you actually imagine one hit (or breathing secondhand smoke) being distributed to enough blood to be prevalent in a test that checks one hair on the body? this THC would be so dilluted that is would be extremely hard to detect. not to mention it isnt just stored in yout 6 quarts of blood but also in your fat cells/hair/mucus etc. if it is a low paying job they would use urine analysis. hair follicle is much harder to cheat, but still has limitations.

tl;dr version: one hit = you are 99% good.

This post was edited by juliusjuice on Jan 5 2011 05:38pm
Member
Posts: 1,617
Joined: Mar 3 2009
Gold: 663.00
Jan 5 2011 07:30pm
Quote (juliusjuice @ Jan 5 2011 07:37pm)
first there are several different calibers of follicle testing as well as every other kind of testing (swab, test, urine, blood etc). you must realize that for the substance to show up in your test at all it must be present in the sample. can you actually imagine one hit (or breathing secondhand smoke) being distributed to enough blood to be prevalent in a test that checks one hair on the body? this THC would be so dilluted that is would be extremely hard to detect. not to mention it isnt just stored in yout 6 quarts of blood but also in your fat cells/hair/mucus etc. if it is a low paying job they would use urine analysis. hair follicle is much harder to cheat, but still has limitations.

tl;dr version: one hit = you are 99% good.


hmm, it is a high paying job, they cut about 100 strands of hair off his head.
Member
Posts: 1,982
Joined: Jan 5 2011
Gold: 36.00
Jan 5 2011 09:01pm
Quote (Irwinjs22 @ Jan 5 2011 06:30pm)
hmm, it is a high paying job, they cut about 100 strands of hair off his head.


I wouldn't worry about it. Now if he smoked more than one hit then he is most likely screwed. Like the poster above you man, he should be straight as long as he just smoked that tiny bit... it takes more than that to be distributed through your body enough to even be present.... as well as there is an accepted level of THC (or a facsimile of the chemical)... I doubt they have the nanogram level low enough to detect that... they would be paying out their freaking nose for it. (my info is actually from a tech at Tripler Army Medical Facility, where the Army does the majority of its testing).
Member
Posts: 9,692
Joined: Apr 10 2006
Gold: 19,597.59
Jan 5 2011 09:53pm
Quote (Irwinjs22 @ Jan 5 2011 08:30pm)
hmm, it is a high paying job, they cut about 100 strands of hair off his head.

well i suppose there is always a small chance, but would they really stress over such a small amount? could have walked by someone outdoors and inhaled that amount.
Member
Posts: 15,477
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 13.37
Jan 5 2011 10:28pm
THC stays in hair for roughly two years.
Member
Posts: 21,747
Joined: Jan 4 2007
Gold: 2.47
Warn: 20%
Jan 6 2011 08:32am
one hit can go back like 3 months.
Member
Posts: 15,197
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 51.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 6 2011 05:16pm
Quote (Lumpy1 @ Jan 5 2011 11:28pm)
THC stays in hair for roughly two years.


no it doesn't

my god you people are retarded
Member
Posts: 13,305
Joined: Sep 28 2005
Gold: 4.21
Jan 6 2011 06:28pm
Quote (Phisherman @ Jan 6 2011 11:16pm)
no it doesn't

my god you people are retarded


we might not agree on everything but at least were on the same page.

these people arnt even reading the same book lmao.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll