d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Archives > Softcore USEast Ladder 2009 > Zomg Look Here #1
Prev1234567Next
Closed New Topic
Member
Posts: 6,418
Joined: Jun 18 2007
Gold: 2,535.85
Sep 21 2009 03:32am
+pi

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751
05820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067
98214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812
84811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819
64428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909
14564856692346034861045432664821339360726024914127
37245870066063155881748815209209628292540917153643
67892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609
43305727036575959195309218611738193261179310511854
80744623799627495673518857527248912279381830119491
Member
Posts: 7,144
Joined: Jul 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2009 03:33am
Quote (MW_Dream @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 05:32am)
+pi

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751
05820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067
98214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812
84811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819
64428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909
14564856692346034861045432664821339360726024914127
37245870066063155881748815209209628292540917153643
67892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609
43305727036575959195309218611738193261179310511854
80744623799627495673518857527248912279381830119491


∞ > all
+47

This post was edited by Monkeboy on Sep 21 2009 03:33am
Member
Posts: 6,418
Joined: Jun 18 2007
Gold: 2,535.85
Sep 21 2009 03:33am
Quote (Monkeboy @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 03:33am)
∞ > all
+47


A New Approach to the Universal Constant "pi"

Attached you will find an original, I would like to believe, research study, concerning «A new approach to the area of a circle» and thus a new approach to the Universal Constant "pi".

The innovative aspect of the new approach is attributed to avoid the insurmountable

obstacles presented by the intervention of square roots and infinite series when we try to calculate the circumference as the

Upper Limit of the perimeter of a regular Polygon inscribed in the circle, according to the relevant "deceptive"

definition, i.e. sin15o = 1/4 {sqrt(6) - sqrt(2)}.

The New Theory considers the above way as an "impasse", which makes us to believe that the so derived number

pi' = 3.14159 2 6535.... is an irrational and trancendental number.

By the new way we approach the area of the circle as the "Lower Limit" of the area of the Superscribed Regular Polygon, coming from the square of side ao = 2R, and we use as main tool the "tangent", the values of which can be easily calculated, with the desirable accuracy, using as algorithm the formula

tan(2q) = 2tanq / {1-tanq} which defines the circle.

By this method we discover that it is impossible for the Lower Limit of the Superscribed Polygon, to be less than the

Limit 4 * 0.7854 = 3.1416.

More precisely the new method meets the Known number

3.14159 2 6535... and proves that in order to reach this number we have violated the sense of the circumference making the arbitrary assumption that: for very acute angles we can consider that

tanq = 1/2 tan(2q) instead of tanq < 1/2 tan(2q), according to the indisputable formula:

tan(2q) = 2tanq / {1-tanq} -> tanq < 1/2 tan(2q) always

and certainly 2sinq < 2arcq < 2tanq always.

However small the side-chord of the inscribed regular polygon, this chord is less than the respective arc and always there exists a minimum area between the chord and the arc, however great is the number N = 4 * 2n of the sides.

The above observation explains the irrational and trancendental character of the so defined circumference, and why "we can not see" the Upper Limit of an inscribed regular polygon.

On the contrary, through the New Theory, which dares the "transgretion", the lower Limit of the regular Superscribed polygon "is visible" and can not be other than 3.1416 R2 exactly.

Also, according to the New Theory, the area of the circle is the first real root of the algebraic equation:

X2 - 4X + 2.69674944 = 0, the second root of which is the 4k = m = 0.8584 R2 that is the area of the 4 equal curvilinear triangles, which lie between the circumference and the perimeter of the superscribed square of side ao = 2R, so that: ...
Member
Posts: 7,144
Joined: Jul 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2009 03:33am
Quote (MW_Dream @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 05:33am)
A New Approach to the Universal Constant "pi"

Attached you will find an original, I would like to believe, research study, concerning «A new approach to the area of a circle» and thus a new approach to the Universal Constant "pi".

The innovative aspect of the new approach is attributed to avoid the insurmountable

obstacles presented by the intervention of square roots and infinite series when we try to calculate the circumference as the

Upper Limit of the perimeter of a regular Polygon inscribed in the circle, according to the relevant "deceptive"

definition, i.e. sin15o = 1/4 {sqrt(6) - sqrt(2)}.

The New Theory considers the above way as an "impasse", which makes us to believe that the so derived number

pi' = 3.14159 2 6535.... is an irrational and trancendental number.

By the new way we approach the area of the circle as the "Lower Limit" of the area of the Superscribed Regular Polygon, coming from the square of side ao = 2R, and we use as main tool the "tangent", the values of which can be easily calculated, with the desirable accuracy, using as algorithm the formula

tan(2q) = 2tanq / {1-tanq} which defines the circle.

By this method we discover that it is impossible for the Lower Limit of the Superscribed Polygon, to be less than the

Limit 4 * 0.7854 = 3.1416.

More precisely the new method meets the Known number

3.14159 2 6535... and proves that in order to reach this number we have violated the sense of the circumference making the arbitrary assumption that: for very acute angles we can consider that

tanq = 1/2 tan(2q) instead of tanq < 1/2 tan(2q), according to the indisputable formula:

tan(2q) = 2tanq / {1-tanq} -> tanq < 1/2 tan(2q) always

and certainly 2sinq < 2arcq < 2tanq always.

However small the side-chord of the inscribed regular polygon, this chord is less than the respective arc and always there exists a minimum area between the chord and the arc, however great is the number N = 4 * 2n of the sides.

The above observation explains the irrational and trancendental character of the so defined circumference, and why "we can not see" the Upper Limit of an inscribed regular polygon.

On the contrary, through the New Theory, which dares the "transgretion", the lower Limit of the regular Superscribed polygon "is visible" and can not be other than 3.1416 R2 exactly.

Also, according to the New Theory, the area of the circle is the first real root of the algebraic equation:

X2 - 4X + 2.69674944 = 0, the second root of which is the 4k = m = 0.8584 R2 that is the area of the 4 equal curvilinear triangles, which lie between the circumference and the perimeter of the superscribed square of side ao = 2R, so that: ...


+49

This post was edited by Monkeboy on Sep 21 2009 03:34am
Member
Posts: 7,144
Joined: Jul 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2009 03:34am
Quote (Monkeboy @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 05:33am)
+49


+50
Member
Posts: 22,048
Joined: Jul 4 2003
Gold: 14.78
Sep 21 2009 03:34am
Quote (MW_Dream @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 04:33am)
A New Approach to the Universal Constant "pi"

Attached you will find an original, I would like to believe, research study, concerning «A new approach to the area of a circle» and thus a new approach to the Universal Constant "pi".

The innovative aspect of the new approach is attributed to avoid the insurmountable

obstacles presented by the intervention of square roots and infinite series when we try to calculate the circumference as the

Upper Limit of the perimeter of a regular Polygon inscribed in the circle, according to the relevant "deceptive"

definition, i.e. sin15o = 1/4 {sqrt(6) - sqrt(2)}.

The New Theory considers the above way as an "impasse", which makes us to believe that the so derived number

pi' = 3.14159 2 6535.... is an irrational and trancendental number.

By the new way we approach the area of the circle as the "Lower Limit" of the area of the Superscribed Regular Polygon, coming from the square of side ao = 2R, and we use as main tool the "tangent", the values of which can be easily calculated, with the desirable accuracy, using as algorithm the formula

tan(2q) = 2tanq / {1-tanq} which defines the circle.

By this method we discover that it is impossible for the Lower Limit of the Superscribed Polygon, to be less than the

Limit 4 * 0.7854 = 3.1416.

More precisely the new method meets the Known number

3.14159 2 6535... and proves that in order to reach this number we have violated the sense of the circumference making the arbitrary assumption that: for very acute angles we can consider that

tanq = 1/2 tan(2q) instead of tanq < 1/2 tan(2q), according to the indisputable formula:

tan(2q) = 2tanq / {1-tanq} -> tanq < 1/2 tan(2q) always

and certainly 2sinq < 2arcq < 2tanq always.

However small the side-chord of the inscribed regular polygon, this chord is less than the respective arc and always there exists a minimum area between the chord and the arc, however great is the number N = 4 * 2n of the sides.

The above observation explains the irrational and trancendental character of the so defined circumference, and why "we can not see" the Upper Limit of an inscribed regular polygon.

On the contrary, through the New Theory, which dares the "transgretion", the lower Limit of the regular Superscribed polygon "is visible" and can not be other than 3.1416 R2 exactly.

Also, according to the New Theory, the area of the circle is the first real root of the algebraic equation:

X2 - 4X + 2.69674944 = 0, the second root of which is the 4k = m = 0.8584 R2 that is the area of the 4 equal curvilinear triangles, which lie between the circumference and the perimeter of the superscribed square of side ao = 2R, so that: ...


+50

WOOT :smiley slap:
Member
Posts: 4,562
Joined: Jan 22 2009
Gold: 2.00
Sep 21 2009 03:35am
plus 1
Member
Posts: 7,144
Joined: Jul 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2009 03:35am
Quote (JoKa @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 05:34am)
+51

WOOT :smiley slap:



Quote (Bradmaster99 @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 05:35am)
plus 1



+53
Member
Posts: 6,418
Joined: Jun 18 2007
Gold: 2,535.85
Sep 21 2009 03:36am
In mathematics and the arts, two quantities are in the golden ratio if the ratio of the sum of the quantities to the larger one equals the ratio of the larger one to the smaller. The golden ratio is an irrational mathematical constant, approximately 1.6180339887.[1] Other names frequently used for the golden ratio are the golden section (Latin: sectio aurea) and golden mean.[2][3][4] Other terms encountered include extreme and mean ratio,[5] medial section, divine proportion, divine section (Latin: sectio divina), golden proportion, golden cut,[6] golden number, and mean of Phidias.[7][8][9] The golden ratio is often denoted by the Greek letter phi, usually lower case (φ).

The figure on the right illustrates the geometric relationship that defines this constant. Expressed algebraically:

\frac{a+b}{a} = \frac{a}{b} = \varphi\,.

This equation has as its unique positive solution the algebraic irrational number

\varphi = \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx 1.61803\,39887\ldots\, [1]

At least since the Renaissance, many artists and architects have proportioned their works to approximate the golden ratio—especially in the form of the golden rectangle, in which the ratio of the longer side to the shorter is the golden ratio—believing this proportion to be aesthetically pleasing. Mathematicians have studied the golden ratio because of its unique and interesting properties.
Member
Posts: 7,144
Joined: Jul 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2009 03:37am
Quote (MW_Dream @ Mon, Sep 21 2009, 05:36am)
In mathematics and the arts, two quantities are in the golden ratio if the ratio of the sum of the quantities to the larger one equals the ratio of the larger one to the smaller. The golden ratio is an irrational mathematical constant, approximately 1.6180339887.[1] Other names frequently used for the golden ratio are the golden section (Latin: sectio aurea) and golden mean.[2][3][4] Other terms encountered include extreme and mean ratio,[5] medial section, divine proportion, divine section (Latin: sectio divina), golden proportion, golden cut,[6] golden number, and mean of Phidias.[7][8][9] The golden ratio is often denoted by the Greek letter phi, usually lower case (φ).

The figure on the right illustrates the geometric relationship that defines this constant. Expressed algebraically:

\frac{a+b}{a} = \frac{a}{b} = \varphi\,.

This equation has as its unique positive solution the algebraic irrational number

\varphi = \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx 1.61803\,39887\ldots\, [1]

At least since the Renaissance, many artists and architects have proportioned their works to approximate the golden ratio—especially in the form of the golden rectangle, in which the ratio of the longer side to the shorter is the golden ratio—believing this proportion to be aesthetically pleasing. Mathematicians have studied the golden ratio because of its unique and interesting properties.


♦♥♣♠
+55
Go Back To Softcore USEast Ladder 2009 Topic List
Prev1234567Next
Closed New Topic