d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Do You Always Need Proof?
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Dec 24 2011 08:29pm
The concept of 'belief' is iffy. Every human has to rely on belief to some degree.

Example: If you buy a can of beans from a grocery store, do you need proof that there are beans in the can? Or do you just believe that there are beans in there based on the circumstantial evidence of whats written on the label?

People's answers to the question can only be in varying degrees i.e. how much proof do you need to believe in something etc

This post was edited by kayeto on Dec 24 2011 08:30pm
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 24 2011 08:40pm
Quote (kayeto @ Dec 24 2011 09:29pm)
The concept of 'belief' is iffy. Every human has to rely on belief to some degree.

Example: If you buy a can of beans from a grocery store, do you need proof that there are beans in the can? Or do you just believe that there are beans in there based on the circumstantial evidence of whats written on the label?

People's answers to the question can only be in varying degrees i.e. how much proof do you need to believe in something etc

For that example: You know the weight of an empty can from experience. You can tell that the can is heavier than an empty can. From past experiences, you also know that every time in the past that you have opened a can of beans, there were beans inside. Every single time. You can trust that there are beans in this can labeled beans at the grocery store, but you cannot have faith that there are beans inside. That is the difference between the two.
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Dec 24 2011 08:43pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 24 2011 09:40pm)
For that example: You know the weight of an empty can from experience. You can tell that the can is heavier than an empty can. From past experiences, you also know that every time in the past that you have opened a can of beans, there were beans inside. Every single time. You can trust that there are beans in this can labeled beans at the grocery store, but you cannot have faith that there are beans inside. That is the difference between the two.


but how do your 2 italicized words relate to 'belief'?

the thread was about belief .. not trust or faith....
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 24 2011 08:56pm
Quote (kayeto @ Dec 24 2011 09:43pm)
but how do your 2 italicized words relate to 'belief'?

the thread was about belief .. not trust or faith....

There are reasonable "beliefs" based on past experience through repeatedly reproducible evidence and trust and unreasonable beliefs based on the hope that those beliefs are actually true.

I wouldn't even use the word "belief" to describe the fact that a can of beans actually has beans inside of it.
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Dec 24 2011 09:14pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 24 2011 09:56pm)
There are reasonable "beliefs" based on past experience through repeatedly reproducible evidence.

I wouldn't even use the word "belief" to describe the fact that a can of beans actually has beans inside of it.


Then what is a reasonable "belief" as defined by the words you just used?
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 24 2011 09:24pm
Quote (kayeto @ Dec 24 2011 10:14pm)
Then what is a reasonable "belief" as defined by the words you just used?

I defined it already and you quoted that definition. A "belief" is reasonable if it is based on past experience through repeatedly reproducible evidence.
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Dec 24 2011 09:33pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 24 2011 10:24pm)
I defined it already and you quoted that definition. A "belief" is reasonable if it is based on past experience through repeatedly reproducible evidence.


But you said you wouldn't use the world belief to describe my bean can example. So what would be an example of a reasonable belief then?
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 24 2011 09:36pm
Quote (kayeto @ Dec 24 2011 10:33pm)
But you said you wouldn't use the world belief to describe my bean can example. So what would be an example of a reasonable belief then?

If something is not based on reliably reproducible evidence, then belief in that things is irrational, and I would consider such a belief unreasonable. That is why I would not use the word belief for any scenario that you can have reliably reproducible evidence to justify a claim (e.g. that beans are inside the bean can).
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Dec 24 2011 09:54pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 24 2011 10:36pm)
If something is not based on reliably reproducible evidence, then belief in that things is irrational, and I would consider such a belief unreasonable. That is why I would not use the word belief for any scenario that you can have reliably reproducible evidence to justify a claim (e.g. that beans are inside the bean can).


ok, so then what IS an example of something that IS a "reasonable belief" ?
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 24 2011 10:03pm
I can't think of one. Feel free to post suggestions, if you want, but I was only said "reasonable 'belief' " to keep using the same terminology that you had been using.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll