d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Monolths
Prev17172737475174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 25 2017 07:45pm
Quote (Santara @ Jan 25 2017 03:29pm)
Hey stupid, the high energy radiation isn't the glass wall, it's what the glass wall blocks out.



The wall you think you can walk though? :rofl:

http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jan 25 2017 07:50pm
Quote (Tard_sultan @ Jan 25 2017 07:45pm)
The wall you think you can walk though? :rofl:

http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm


We've already covered that your use of sources is laughable, don't reinforce it with:

Quote
Aulis Publishers is based in the UK and was founded nearly 25 years ago to provide a flexible outlet for articles, books, DVDs and videos. The aim of Aulis Online and its associated websites is to promote greater awareness and stimulate different thinking. Aulis publishes works that 'fly in the face' of orthodoxy and established thought. The intention is to present alternative ideas and discuss new ways of viewing the future of mankind.


This post was edited by Santara on Jan 25 2017 07:56pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 25 2017 10:17pm
Quote (Santara @ Jan 25 2017 03:50pm)
We've already covered that your use of sources is laughable, don't reinforce it with:


Actually that description sounds nice, sounds like a description that will best serve the world in the 21st century. It's better than blindly following the military who presents cgi and demands you believe its real and only if you do, then can you think of yourself as a patriot.
That sounds pretty much like creepy old 20th century fantasies.
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
Jan 25 2017 10:49pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 25 2017 05:52pm)

Impermeable plasma[edit]
Impermeable plasma is a type of thermal plasma which acts like an impermeable solid with respect to gas or cold plasma and can be physically pushed.

If you can physical push it - that's like a wall or ceiling - its basic a super heated kinda like magma inside a solid that acts like a liquid, thinking its just a magnetic field which that artist drawing sort of infers - i think it just a way to get you to thinking its just a magnetic field.


I wasn't at all surprised that you have no idea what plasma is, but even I didn't expect you to know nothing about gasses. I'll give you a quick hint - the human body is not a gas. Neither are rockets, satellites, etc.
Hmm.. I wonder in what grade kids learn about the 3 states of matter. I can picture a quiz that shows pictures of everyday objects and asks you if it's a gas or not. Like a picture of a bicycle and a question "is this a gas?" Whatever grade that is, we now know Card's understanding of the world is below that.

You can physically push air as well, we even have special devices that do just that - fans. I guess every human that claims to be able to walk through air is a NASA disinfo agent.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 26 2017 02:47am
Quote (russian @ Jan 25 2017 06:49pm)
I wasn't at all surprised that you have no idea what plasma is, but even I didn't expect you to know nothing about gasses. I'll give you a quick hint - the human body is not a gas. Neither are rockets, satellites, etc.
Hmm.. I wonder in what grade kids learn about the 3 states of matter. I can picture a quiz that shows pictures of everyday objects and asks you if it's a gas or not. Like a picture of a bicycle and a question "is this a gas?" Whatever grade that is, we now know Card's understanding of the world is below that.

You can physically push air as well, we even have special devices that do just that - fans. I guess every human that claims to be able to walk through air is a NASA disinfo agent.


I should have known that you would only think that plasma can only be a gas, Probably because your idea of space is that its a near vacuum made of nothing and you believe whatever your told to think and whatever Nasa artists draw in their CGI.

So whats your proof that Nature produces near vacuums and that they exist right next to an atmosphere without sucking it up because vacuums are always more powerful than gravity, Why is the Universe 95 % Dark energy/Matter and your precious astro priest's have no idea what it is - isnt that convenient does that sound like a gas to you? 95% stupidity sounds more like it.

Where is your video proof that you can put your flesh in a plasma torch just fine? Offer some proof for once besides your ridiculous stupid assumptions plz. Stop dodging.

Maybe you should call up the internet and tell them to stop using words like metal and super heated liquid and crystalline structure to describe plasma because you think its blasphemous. Atheist are so ridiculously stupid.



What your proof that the Sun is a burning ball of gas? Let me guess - is it something like "I was told that" :rofl:

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 26 2017 02:58am
Member
Posts: 52,225
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jan 26 2017 05:32am
Quote (Tard_sultan @ Jan 25 2017 10:17pm)
Actually that description sounds nice, sounds like a description that will best serve the world in the 21st century. It's better than blindly following the military who presents cgi and demands you believe its real and only if you do, then can you think of yourself as a patriot.
That sounds pretty much like creepy old 20th century fantasies.


It sounds nice if you want to ignore reality and peddle fantasies, yes.

I'm sure the irony flew right past your tiny brain that you can somehow use parallax to disprove pictures on the moon but you can't use parallax to prove the Earth is round.

Quote (Tard_sultan @ Jan 26 2017 02:47am)
I should have known that you would only think that plasma can only be a gas, Probably because your idea of space is that its a near vacuum made of nothing and you believe whatever your told to think and whatever Nasa artists draw in their CGI.

So whats your proof that Nature produces near vacuums and that they exist right next to an atmosphere without sucking it up because vacuums are always more powerful than gravity, Why is the Universe 95 % Dark energy/Matter and your precious astro priest's have no idea what it is - isnt that convenient does that sound like a gas to you? 95% stupidity sounds more like it.

Where is your video proof that you can put your flesh in a plasma torch just fine? Offer some proof for once besides your ridiculous stupid assumptions plz. Stop dodging.

Maybe you should call up the internet and tell them to stop using words like metal and super heated liquid and crystalline structure to describe plasma because you think its blasphemous. Atheist are so ridiculously stupid.

http://i66.tinypic.com/1583t55.jpg

What your proof that the Sun is a burning ball of gas? Let me guess - is it something like "I was told that" :rofl:


Part of me wants to explain to you that plasma is not solid and also how vacuums operate. The other part of me wants to see how far you can push the idiocy.
Member
Posts: 92,978
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 26 2017 07:23am
LOL solid glass ceiling is what he takes from the article and leaves the rest. then shares a source that admits it only promotes free thinking with no verification.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 26 2017 11:36am
Quote (Santa-tard @ Jan 26 2017 01:32am)
It sounds nice if you want to ignore reality and peddle fantasies, yes.

I'm sure the irony flew right past your tiny brain that you can somehow use parallax to disprove pictures on the moon but you can't use parallax to prove the Earth is round.



Part of me wants to explain to you that plasma is not solid and also how vacuums operate. The other part of me wants to see how far you can push the idiocy.


I've posted proof that you can use parallax and trigonometry to prove the moon is only 3000 miles away - your're just to retarded to understand it.

Just like you cant understand the flat Earth is round because a circle is round.

Really your going to prove to me how vacuums work - cool - can you start with explaining why Nature never creates them and how a vacuum cant exist right next to a body of air, and how they were able to bounce signals off of something in the atmosphere long before there was satellites, really , vacuumous air reflect radio signals - um ok - ill be waiting for that explanation too.



Also explain to me how you think you can walk though diamond - your ridiculousness to make up excuses knows no bounds.

Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 26 2017 03:23am)
LOL solid glass ceiling is what he takes from the article and leaves the rest. then shares a source that admits it only promotes free thinking with no verification.


pathetic - uses free thinking and no verification of opinion to chastise free thinking and no verification. The irony flew right by you i'm sure. Please get your opinion peer reviewed by professional cucks in the future, ok?
And actually lots of people like his theory and proof, you just dont know their names. :P

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 26 2017 11:47am
Member
Posts: 92,978
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 26 2017 12:06pm
still waiting on an explanation of perspective explaining why the horizon should be seen as curved from low elevations on a sphere model.

any pictures would do. phrases like "you have to understand the z axis" and "you can't show it on a 2d picture" won't do. we have 3 dimensional perspective views for a reason, there's no reason a top, side, and end view can't be drawn to show the math behind a curved horizon.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 26 2017 12:26pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 26 2017 08:06am)
still waiting on an explanation of perspective explaining why the horizon should be seen as curved from low elevations on a sphere model.

any pictures would do. phrases like "you have to understand the z axis" and "you can't show it on a 2d picture" won't do. we have 3 dimensional perspective views for a reason, there's no reason a top, side, and end view can't be drawn to show the math behind a curved horizon.


Easy, get any sphere and get a camera and look at the edge, you'll see the curve and you'll understand why you cant explain a 3 dimension horizon by thinking the math of a single point on a 2 dimensional model is just retarded logic to fool you.

Most people are fooled pretty easy with logical fallacies - thats covering up lie with another lie and changing the subject and usually theirs an appeal to authority involved. See its easy to prove a lie is wrong , but when you introduce another lie on top of it by changing the perspective - it gives you the opportunity to create circle jerk logic and then you throw in an appeal to authority - perhaps a ridiculous assumption - who could deny that right?

It reminds me of the line If you cant dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.

Nasa is good with the BS, like stories about throwing their dirty underwear into space - thats a good one really.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev17172737475174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll