Quote (Azrad @ Jul 18 2016 10:54pm)
Step 1: make up a new term:
Step 2: use the new term in a way that violates the definition you just made up:
You will note, your definition said that the movement is "all in that direction", but when you used the term earlier you told us that the Earth was moving in 4 different directions. Your crack-pottery isn't consistent with standard physics, and it isn't consistent with itself either.
DIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONDIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONDIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONDIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONDIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONDIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONDIRECTION IS ONLY A POINT, A VECTOR IS MOVEMENT IN THAT DIRECTIONAND YOU'RE STILL THE BIGGEST NUTTER, WITHOUT A DOUBT
HOW DOES ANYONE STAND YOU?
NO WONDER YOU'RE LOCKED.
AND ACCORDING TO THE DINGBAT HELIOCENTRIC MODEL, THE EARTH IS MOVING - AND EACH CAN BE DESCRIBED WITH VECTORS.
AIR HAS MASS AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM DOES CHANGE THE FACT THAT IT'S STILL A FORCE THAT DOESN'T EXIST.
STOP BLEEDING ON ME
This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 18 2016 10:27pm