d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo > Diablo 3 > D3 Discussion > [2/23/10] - So, If You Guys Were Willing To Pay..
1236Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1612Replies: 50Track Topic
Member
Posts: 20,165
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 692.20
#1
Feb 23 2010 09:25pm
[2/23/10] - So, if you guys were willing to pay for...
Source: http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23329533169&postId=233908340152&sid=3000#9


Original Post:
Quote
A crapload of deticated server space, what would be the advantages?

I can see a server where inputs would be restricted enough that dupung would not only be obvious to Blizz but cheating in general would be easily confronted and eliminated. Could 100% of the game be interpreted on the server side so only the inputs get through or am i dreaming?

Then again, seems like if it was just that, bots would still exist.

please tell me that d2 does not work in this way.



Response:
Quote
I think the OP was more implying that a fee would change how our server infrastructure would work in order to avoid hacks and dupes and the like. Which would imply it would be designed less secure if no monthly fee were involved, which just isn't the case.

Diablo II is an old game. It was programmed and designed a long time ago. There are holes and client-server relationship choices that would not be repeated today regardless of business model. Mostly because we're not all running around on 28.8's anymore.
Member
Posts: 26,292
Joined: Sep 15 2005
Gold: 30.01
#2
Feb 23 2010 10:18pm
sounds good to me!

Member
Posts: 10,411
Joined: Jun 1 2007
Gold: 0.00
#3
Feb 23 2010 10:25pm
I like no monthly fee. Even though i would totally pay it if they had it.
Member
Posts: 12,494
Joined: Dec 3 2009
Gold: 22,100.00
#4
Feb 23 2010 11:16pm
Quote (KillerBunnies @ Feb 23 2010 11:25pm)
I like no monthly fee. Even though i would totally pay it if they had it.


I would not
Member
Posts: 14,968
Joined: Aug 13 2007
Gold: 220.00
#5
Feb 23 2010 11:20pm
Quote (kosh @ 24 Feb 2010 01:16)
I would not


neither would I.

Paying to play one game=retarded.

Member
Posts: 10,572
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 4.37
#6
Feb 23 2010 11:39pm
Quote (joshchx @ Feb 24 2010 05:20am)
neither would I.

Paying to play one game=retarded.


A lot of people consider "gaming" to be their hobby. People spend money on hobbies.

P2P is not as big of a deal as most think. Yes of course we would all love to not have to pay....

I play wow, it's was $15 a month and it goes unnoticeable..i hardly miss that $15.
Member
Posts: 17,189
Joined: Jun 2 2006
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 70%
#7
Feb 23 2010 11:54pm
Quote (stupidkid282 @ Feb 23 2010 09:39pm)
A lot of people consider "gaming" to be their hobby. People spend money on hobbies.

P2P is not as big of a deal as most think. Yes of course we would all love to not have to pay....

I play wow, it's was $15 a month and it goes unnoticeable..i hardly miss that $15.


15$ x 12moths =180 a year not much till to multiply that by 1 million.
Member
Posts: 33,081
Joined: Jan 22 2006
Gold: 2,892.50
#8
Feb 24 2010 06:39am
Quote (funkynoc1 @ Feb 24 2010 12:54am)
15$ x 12moths =180 a year not much till to multiply that by 1 million.


But all YOU are paying is $180 a year
Member
Posts: 43,629
Joined: Jun 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
#9
Feb 24 2010 07:43am
"Which would imply it would be designed less secure if no monthly fee were involved, which just isn't the case."

Meaning there will be pay2play ???
Member
Posts: 7,500
Joined: Dec 5 2008
Gold: 0.00
#10
Feb 24 2010 05:29pm
You know what would be great, if you payed 15$ per month to play all bnet games. BUT they should do that only if there will be monthly fees for d3 and sc2.

This post was edited by Phoenix13 on Feb 24 2010 05:29pm
Go Back To D3 Discussion Topic List
1236Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact