guys i had the c/o on these boots for most of the time that the thread was up



stumpy posted bin after the bin was posted. i never saw that a bin was posted until the next day.

here's the timeline of posts:
#39 9 May 2013 22:02 - i posted 1.6k offer to keep c/o (10:00pm eastern time)
#40 10 May 2013 04:07 - silverskating31 posts the bin price at 4:07am. i did not see that post because i was asleep.
#41 10 May 2013 09:11 - a bump or something 5 hours later, edited since. i did not see that one either. i was probably still sleeping like a wee babe by then
#42 10 May 2013 11:38 - stumpy posts bin. i'm not sure what time i woke up but i wasn't on jsp at the time either. also worth noting i did not have thread tracked so wouldn't see it unless it hit the top of the useast subforum
#43 10 May 2013 18:09 - now 6:06pm eastern, silverskating posts to say holding for stumpy or something like that, been edited since. this post brings the topic back to the top of the forum
#44 10 May 2013 18:18 - 9minutes later when i see the thread i post that i would bin, but hadn't seen the bin posted yet

i was strongly contending for top offer from #24 7 May 2013 04:02 (1k) to #39 9 May 2013 22:02 (1.6k)
stumpy had not made any offers in thread as far as i am aware, so selling to him several hours after posting a bin that your top bidder hasn't seen yet would have been pretty fucked up.
apparently, silverskating agreed with my opinion on the matter (he came to me about it not the other way around, i in no way told him he should 'bm' stumpy, for the record)

so tl;dr silverskating31 sold to me because i held the c/o and wanted the bin, even though stumpy posted bin first. the only thing BM about the matter is posting misinformation in the thread rather than telling the truth about it