Quote (iHox @ Feb 5 2010 05:33am)
I need a small paper written by 9:00am EST ( 3:30 hours ).
Use 500-700 words to respond to the following:
Kevin Kelly and Henry David Thoreau could be seen as crucially agreeing with Aristotle on the nature of well-being, but disagreeing with each other, and maybe even Aristotle, on the usefulness of technology to living a good life. Explain this. In what way exactly could they be seen as agreeing with Aristotle on well-being? In what way exactly could they be see as disagreeing on the usefulness of technology?
In your answer, state your position on these questions, then back up your answer with specific evidence from the texts we have read of each author. What does each author say that indicates his view on the issue?
Lastly, say which author has the best view on the usefulness of technology to living well and give at least two reasons in support of your view.
This will not be hard, I will provide you with the readings from Kelly, Thoreau, and Aristotle.
Let me know if you are interested, serious people only please.
*Only 500-700 words for 295fg!!*
This.