d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Better Site Rule Enforcement > Warn Removal Confusion
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 2,622
Joined: Oct 13 2007
Gold: 628.26
Jun 3 2011 10:23pm
Should the rules be followed by everyone?
I have done some checking around and have noticed something that truly bothers me.
People who get warn for doing things against the rules like personal attacks,
posting nudity, talking about bots and scams etc.. get their 10% warn and it is removed
promptly in 30 days, and yet, people who get their warn for annoying someone in the religious forums
get their warn and keep it for half a year or more.

I cant understand how this is congruent with site rules when the rules specifically state that:
The warn removal period varies depending on the number of warnings you have received.

I personally knowl people who have had only one warn in the entire time they have been on this site and those who got it for
annoying someone in the religious forum have all had to wait more than the 30 days it should take for removal, while those that got it for annoying someone
in the general chat or elsewhere on the site had to wait the minimum time and it was promptly removed. Is this equality?

The rules should either be followed as is or should be changed to take into account the difference
in warn removal time for each offense or at least for each different forum. So far this is NOT happening.
If we as members of the site ABSOLUTELY MUST follow the rules as they are stated should the mods not
be held to the same standards. As leaders and role models shouldnt they be an example of what it is
to be an upstanding member of this site?

If we allow people to change the rules at a whim how are, we as members, to know what is right and what is wrong anymore?


Member
Posts: 10,228
Joined: Oct 27 2008
Gold: 9,834.89
Jun 3 2011 11:02pm
Just because you're mad because you got warn for annoying someone in the religious forums and it's not getting off doesn't mean you have to make a suggestion to change it.
Member
Posts: 11,885
Joined: May 19 2006
Gold: 1,092.39
Jun 4 2011 12:50am
Quote (Michael515 @ Jun 4 2011 01:02am)
Just because you're mad because you got warn for annoying someone in the religious forums and it's not getting off doesn't mean you have to make a suggestion to change it.


to be fair, many people in the religious subforum are borderline psychotic.

This post was edited by someone3 on Jun 4 2011 12:50am
Member
Posts: 24,008
Joined: Nov 18 2008
Gold: 10,219.79
Jun 4 2011 12:56am
There was was probably just rejected, or they showed no improvement in there behavior, the rules where not changed for the user(s)

So your suggestion is valid, sorry
Member
Posts: 2,622
Joined: Oct 13 2007
Gold: 628.26
Jun 5 2011 07:53pm
instead of just looking at it and running off grow some nuts and vote/post opinions.
22 views and 3 responses with 5 votes? wow guys.
Member
Posts: 70,575
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 9,004.00
Jun 5 2011 10:49pm
Quote (sirfrozt @ 6 Jun 2011 03:53)
instead of just looking at it and running off grow some nuts and vote/post opinions.
22 views and 3 responses with 5 votes? wow guys.


"grow some nuts" to post on some internet board anonymously? wtf?

I got my warn for a dumb reason but I'm not going to try and talk it out.
It's obvious that you're butthurt for the reason already posted and I don't think anything needs to change because of that, except you.

Who cares about some internet warn, seriously?
Member
Posts: 606
Joined: May 7 2011
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jun 5 2011 11:37pm
i dont break the rules so there is no reason for me to try to do anything because its not going to affect me either way
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Closed New Topic New Poll