I don't think someone with almost every achievement in the game would risk their account for that im sure hes a great player.

This guy is closer; http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/character/eredar/Joolanda/achievement

Iapeto (Someone IN his guild) has more ach points then him, though by only 10 points. Then there's this guy: http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/character/Eredar/Joolanda/advanced is only missing 7 to Ataxus' 10 achievements.

Either way that shit is too much of a time sink imo.

i thought retail players were sad
but lol

2700 days of played time /10

only 1 gladiator mount

nowhere close to rank 14 in vanilla

no legendaries

i don't think these guys are anywhere close to 100% achievements completed? sucks for these virgins.

feats of strength are an entirely different story... don't think one can disqualify from the race based on when they started playing. Ataxus started in BC.

i want to know his time played lol

at least 600 days, at least

100% achievements, literally or theoretically, means 100% achievements.

This guy paid exorbitant amounts of money for pvp achievements, and played 3000 days /played, to achieve like... 91% achievements.

Ok, but this is about 100% achievements, not achievements + feats of strength. The latter would require scarab lord/every raid mount since vanilla/every season gladiator...

Not even possible to attain. I think all reasonable definitions for world firsts require you to be able to get it, lol.

Also, image replies don't really add to arguments.